Sony T900 vs Sony A65
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
64 Imaging
63 Features
85 Overall
71
Sony T900 vs Sony A65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed February 2009
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
- Released November 2011
- Later Model is Sony A68
Sony T900 vs Sony A65 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Sony T900 versus Sony A65, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR and both are built by Sony. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the T900 (12MP) and A65 (24MP) and the T900 (1/2.3") and A65 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe T900 was manufactured 3 years before the A65 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A65 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick overview of how the T900 grades against the A65 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sony T900 vs Sony A65 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 and Sony SLT-A65. The entire galleries are provided at Sony T900 Gallery and Sony A65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Sony A65
T900 | A65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 921k | Clearer display (+1k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Sony T900
A65 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2011 | February 2009 | More recent by 33 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Sony T900 and Sony A65
T900 | A65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing |
Sony T900 vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Sony T900 features physical measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Sony A65 has measurements of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") having a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).
Analyze the Sony T900 versus Sony A65 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the T900 and the A65.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the T900 and A65 is 96 and 64 respectively.
Sony T900 vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements only by going over specs. The visual below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the T900 and A65.
All in all, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The T900 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony A65 will offer you extra detail due to its extra 12MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older T900 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Sony T900 vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony T900 vs Sony A65 Specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | Sony SLT-A65 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | Sony SLT-A65 |
Class | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2009-02-17 | 2011-11-15 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 15 |
Cross focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 35-140mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-10.0 | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 922k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 2s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) | 10.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 143 gr (0.32 lbs) | 622 gr (1.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 717 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 560 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $300 | $700 |