Sony TX200V vs Sony W330
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
96 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Sony TX200V vs Sony W330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 128g - 96 x 57 x 17mm
- Released January 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Sony TX200V vs Sony W330 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Sony TX200V vs Sony W330, both Ultracompact digital cameras and both are created by Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the TX200V (18MP) and W330 (14MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TX200V was released 2 years later than the W330 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the TX200V scores vs the W330 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Sony TX200V vs Sony W330 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330. The complete galleries are viewable at Sony TX200V Gallery & Sony W330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Sony W330
| TX200V | W330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 26 months |
| Display dimension | 3.3" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+1000k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W330 over the Sony TX200V
| W330 | TX200V |
|---|
Common features in the Sony TX200V and Sony W330
| TX200V | W330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Sony TX200V vs Sony W330 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and size. The Sony TX200V features outside measurements of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Sony W330 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 17mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Sony TX200V vs Sony W330 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that moment. The following is the front view scale comparison of the TX200V and the W330.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TX200V and W330 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Sony TX200V vs Sony W330 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements purely by going over a spec sheet. The graphic below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the TX200V and W330.
As you can see, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Sony TX200V to offer extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The newer TX200V should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Sony TX200V vs Sony W330 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Sony TX200V vs Sony W330 Specifications
| Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Sony | Sony |
| Model type | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2012-01-30 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | BIONZ | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/2.7-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 4cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 1,230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 2s | 2s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 129g (0.28 pounds) | 128g (0.28 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 96 x 57 x 17mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-BN | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $500 | $170 |