Sony W320 vs Sony W800: Which Compact Shooter Fits Your Creative Journey?

Choosing the right compact camera can be surprisingly nuanced. Even within the same brand and category, like Sony's Cyber-shot lineup, subtle differences in specs and performance can swing the balance for your photography needs. Today, we'll dive deep into two popular ultracompact entries: the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800.

With over 15 years of hands-on camera testing, we've scrutinized these models side-by-side across photography genres, technical specs, and real-world use to help you find the camera that fits your creative path. Whether you're a beginner, hobbyist, or looking for a no-fuss backup, this comprehensive comparison breaks down what matters most.

First Impressions: Size, Ergonomics, and Handling

Both the W320 and W800 target easy-to-carry, pocket-friendly photography. The W320 edges ahead in compactness, with dimensions of 93 x 52 x 17 mm and a feather-light weight of only 117 grams, making it an ideal companion for travel or everyday carry. The W800 is a bit chunkier at 97 x 55 x 21 mm, weighing 125 grams, which still counts as highly portable.

From ergonomic testing, the W320’s slimmer body feels sleeker but offers less grip security - something to consider for those with larger hands or who shoot in challenging conditions. The W800's thicker design allows for a better hold despite the small size. Neither camera sports a dedicated grip, which is typical for ultracompacts.

Controls on both cameras are minimalistic and straightforward, with no manual dials or customizable buttons. You operate primarily through menus and a handful of function keys. The W320, being older, offers a simpler layout; the W800 adds slightly enhanced button tactile feedback, boosting ease of use during quick shooting moments.

Display and Interface: What You See is What You Get

Both models come with a 2.7-inch fixed LCD screen with 230k dot resolution, which was standard in their release eras. While not the sharpest by today’s standards, these screens provide decent brightness and color rendering for framing and reviewing your shots outdoors.

Neither camera offers touchscreen support or an electronic viewfinder (EVF), posing limitations for bright daylight usability and those seeking more immersive framing. The lack of touch also means menu navigation can feel clunky compared to modern interfaces - something beginners should be aware of as they learn camera operation basics.

We found the W320’s screen slightly prone to glare, whereas the W800’s TFT LCD panel improves contrast and visibility somewhat. However, neither incorporates articulating mechanisms, so you’re fixed to eye-level framing.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of Your Photos

At the core, both cameras utilize a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor measuring 6.17 x 4.55mm, standard in budget compacts. The W320 offers 14 megapixels, while the W800 pushes this to 20 megapixels. On paper, higher resolution promises more image detail, yet practical results require more nuance to understand.

CCD sensors generally favor color accuracy and noise control, especially at lower ISOs - music to portrait and landscape shooters’ ears. However, the W800’s increased pixel count on the same sensor size means smaller individual pixels, potentially raising noise levels in dim lighting.

Neither camera supports RAW capture, limiting post-processing flexibility. If you’re serious about refining images, this is a significant limitation - but common at this entry level.

On dynamic range and color rendering, both cameras perform adequately for casual use. The W800 gains a slight edge with newer image processing algorithms that improve highlight retention and color vibrancy under various lighting, benefitting landscape photographers especially.

Lens and Zoom: Flexibility in Composition

Both models feature a fixed lens without interchangeable options, typical for the ultracompact class. The W320 offers a 4x optical zoom from 26mm to 105mm equivalent focal length with a maximum aperture of f/2.7-5.7, while the W800 extends zoom slightly to 5x (26-130mm) but with a narrower aperture of f/3.2-6.4.

Practically, the W320's wider maximum aperture at wide and mid zoom ranges favors low-light and shallow depth of field opportunities - especially useful for portraits seeking creamy bokeh. In contrast, the W800 sacrifices aperture for reach, making it better suited for casual telephoto shots, such as distant wildlife or candid street photography.

Neither lens boasts advanced optical elements or stabilization on the W320, whereas the W800 includes optical image stabilization (SteadyShot), a notable upgrade for reducing handshake blur at longer zooms and slower shutter speeds.

Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Speed and Accuracy

Autofocus (AF) systems in both cameras rely on contrast-detection, the norm in compact cameras but inherently slower compared to phase detection systems favored in DSLRs or mirrorless models.

• Sony W320 offers 9 AF points and single-shot AF focus mode only; continuous AF and face detection are absent.
• Sony W800 features an unknown number of focus points (likely similar count) but importantly adds face detection and AF tracking, enhancing focusing reliability, especially in dynamic scenes or portraits.

Continuous shooting speeds are limited to 1 frame per second on both cameras, restricting their usability for fast-moving subjects like sports or wildlife. In real-world trials, focus hunting in low contrast or low light is common on both, with the W800’s face detection helping reduce missed focus on human subjects.

Flash and Low Light Performance

Built-in flashes on both cameras have different capabilities:

The W320’s flash reaches farther, beneficial in dim indoor or group shots, while the W800 offers a more versatile array of modes, including advanced flash options that can contribute to better exposure balance in tricky lighting.

Both struggle with high ISO noise beyond ISO 400; moderate low-light photography will test their capabilities. The W800’s sensor processing delivers slightly cleaner images at ISO 800, but expect noise and softness in extreme settings.

Video Capabilities: When Moving Images Matter

If video recording is in your creative plans:

The W800 clearly surpasses the W320 by providing 720p HD resolution, a big leap forward for basic video content creation and social sharing. The addition of optical stabilization further smooths handheld video capture, making it friendlier for vlogging or spontaneous life moments.

The W320’s VGA video resolution is strictly suitable for quick snippets or casual uses, limited by lower sharpness and outdated compression.

Build Quality and Durability: How They Hold Up

Neither camera is weather-sealed or shockproof, standard for consumer ultracompacts but important if you shoot outdoors or in demanding conditions.

• The W320’s plastic body feels slightly more delicate in comparison.
• The W800 exhibits a more robust but still lightweight plastic chassis.

Neither has dust or moisture resistance, so exercise caution shooting in adverse environments.

Storage, Battery, and Connectivity

Both cameras support multiple storage formats:

• W320: SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo (Pro and Pro HG Duo)
• W800: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo (Pro and Pro HG Duo)

This flexibility keeps you covered on storage options but note that neither supports dual card slots or fast storage interfaces.

Battery info is sparse in official specs, but both rely on compact proprietary NP-BN1 (W320) / NP-BN (W800) batteries. Expect roughly 200-250 shots per charge, typical for point-and-shoot devices. Neither supports USB charging or extended battery grips.

Connectivity options are basic: both include USB 2.0 for file transfer; only the W320 offers mini HDMI output, while the W800 forgoes this feature. Neither model has wireless functionality like Wi-Fi or Bluetooth.

Performance Ratings: Objective Scoring and Real-World Impressions

Although official DXOMark scores are unavailable for these models, our testing and review aggregation indicate:

• W800 rated slightly higher overall, mainly due to improved sensor resolution, optical stabilization, enhanced video, and better autofocus features.
• W320 rated well for ultracompact portability and slightly wider aperture lens benefits.

Breaking down according to photography types:

Photography Genres: Which Camera Excels Where?

Portrait Photography

• W800’s face detection AF and higher resolution sensor give it an edge for portraits.
• W320’s brighter aperture at wide end enables slightly better background blur effects but lacks face detection.
• Neither supports manual focus or RAW, meaning portrait enthusiasts won’t have professional control but the W800 is more beginner-friendly for capturing sharp faces quickly.

Landscape Photography

• Both cameras have limited resolution and dynamic range due to sensor constraints.
• W800’s higher pixels provide more cropping flexibility.
• W320’s wider aperture is less relevant here; landscape shooters prioritize sharpness and detail captured wide open.
• Lack of manual modes or RAW hinders serious landscape editing.

Wildlife Photography

• Both cameras’ slow autofocus and 1fps burst rates make them ill-suited for fast action or animal tracking.
• W800’s longer zoom (130mm vs 105mm) gives a slight advantage for distant subjects.
• Neither offers zoom stabilizations for sharp telephoto shots.

Sports Photography

• Neither camera is appropriate for sports due to limited AF, slow frame rate, and shutter speed caps.

Street Photography

• W320’s smaller size and lighter weight translate to better discretion.
• W800’s improved autofocus and face detection assist in capturing candid moments.
• Both cameras fall short in low-light street scenarios but offer simple point-and-shoot convenience.

Macro Photography

• W320 specifies a 4 cm macro focus range, enabling close-ups with fine detail.
• W800 does not list macro specifics but likely performs similarly.
• Absence of focus stacking or manual focus reduces creative macro control.

Night / Astrophotography

• Both lack long exposure capabilities, manual ISO/exposure controls, and RAW format.
• Noise levels at high ISO reduce image quality in dark scenes.
• Neither model is recommended for night sky photography.

Video

• W800’s 720p HD and optical stabilization make it a functional casual video camera.
• W320 trails behind with VGA video and no stabilization.
• Neither supports external mics or advanced video features.

Travel Photography

• W320’s ultra-compact size and light build make it a better travel companion.
• W800’s better zoom, video, and stabilization add versatility.
• Battery life limitations and lack of wireless connectivity apply to both.

Professional Work

• Neither camera suits professional workflows due to lack of RAW, limited manual control, and modest build.
• These models are best as casual shooters or simple second cameras.

Hands-On Insights: How We Tested and What We Found

Our camera testing methodology involves standardized scenarios (portraits, landscapes, fast moving subjects) under controlled lighting and practical field conditions. Key performance indicators include:

• Sharpness and detail in various focal ranges
• Autofocus reliability and speed
• Handling and user interface efficiency
• Noise and dynamic range assessment across ISO settings
• Video quality at full resolution
• Battery endurance measured in thumbnail shots per charge

Through these tests, the W800 constantly edges out the W320 in ease of use and output quality, reflecting its later release and incremental feature improvements.

Summary Table: Side-by-Side Specs

Who Should Pick Which?

Choose the Sony W320 if:

• You prioritize ultra-compact body size and light weight.
• You want a slightly faster lens for low light and portraits.
• You value simple point-and-shoot without the need for video or advanced AF.
• You don’t mind paying a premium for classic Sony build and design from the earlier generation.

Choose the Sony W800 if:

• You need enhanced zoom reach and better image resolution.
• Video recording in HD with image stabilization matters.
• You want face detection autofocus and some intelligent focusing assistance.
• Budget friendliness is a priority without sacrificing essential photographic features.

Final Thoughts: Bridging Convenience and Performance

While neither of these cameras will satisfy professional demands, their design philosophy emphasizes straightforward photography for casual users, travelers, or as backup cameras.

The W800 stands out with practical upgrades like optical stabilization, HD video, and face detection. The W320 excels in portability and marginally better aperture glass. Both cameras remind us that a compact point-and-shoot still holds value for effortless memory capture, provided you set realistic expectations for image quality and control.

Sony W320 front Sony W320 screen back Sony W800 front Sony W800 screen back

Looking at these real-world sample images side-by-side, you can appreciate the W800’s higher resolution and slightly richer colors, while the W320 delivers decent color accuracy and sharpness at its core. Neither camera impresses in low light, and both exhibit noise past ISO 400, but for bright daylight snaps, they’re capable shooters.

If you seek more creative control, faster performance, or professional-grade image quality, consider stepping up to Sony’s mid-range mirrorless or DSLR lines. Otherwise, either of these cameras offers a hassle-free photography experience complemented by easy handling and compact form.

Happy shooting - and remember, the best camera is the one you have with you to capture the moments that matter!

If you found this expert breakdown useful, check out related reviews and comparisons in our compact camera series. Also, consider pairing your chosen camera with suitable accessories like SD cards, protective cases, and spare batteries to extend your shooting sessions.

We encourage you to visit a local retailer to handle both cameras firsthand - features, ergonomics, and personal feel can make all the difference.

Thank you for trusting our detailed analysis to guide your next camera purchase!