Canon ELPH 310 HS vs Casio EX-Z800
95 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84362/843623f59a92b61bc918e69430528cbdef42bcc3" alt="Canon ELPH 310 HS front Canon ELPH 310 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72ae3/72ae3cba5d945c4704b022d857d153f91ef6548c" alt="Casio Exilim EX-Z800 front Casio Exilim EX-Z800 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Canon ELPH 310 HS vs Casio EX-Z800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-224mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 140g - 96 x 57 x 22mm
- Announced August 2011
- Alternate Name is IXUS 230 HS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Introduced August 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Canon ELPH 310 HS vs Casio EX-Z800 Overview
In this article, we will be analyzing the Canon ELPH 310 HS and Casio EX-Z800, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Canon and Casio. The resolution of the ELPH 310 HS (12MP) and the EX-Z800 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The ELPH 310 HS was introduced 13 months after the EX-Z800 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the ELPH 310 HS grades vs the EX-Z800 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon ELPH 310 HS vs Casio EX-Z800 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon ELPH 310 HS & Casio Exilim EX-Z800. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon ELPH 310 HS Gallery & Casio EX-Z800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 310 HS over the Casio EX-Z800
ELPH 310 HS | EX-Z800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2011 | ![]() | August 2010 | More modern by 13 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Canon ELPH 310 HS
EX-Z800 | ELPH 310 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 310 HS and Casio EX-Z800
ELPH 310 HS | EX-Z800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Canon ELPH 310 HS vs Casio EX-Z800 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Canon ELPH 310 HS offers outer dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) while the Casio EX-Z800 has proportions of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon ELPH 310 HS and Casio EX-Z800 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the ELPH 310 HS and the EX-Z800.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d08e6/d08e66cddf4648b6e27fdb36d814dfba5d26345f" alt="Canon ELPH 310 HS vs Casio EX-Z800 size comparison Canon ELPH 310 HS vs Casio EX-Z800 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the ELPH 310 HS and EX-Z800 is 95 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/162e8/162e807802f24c2a669636e031b740bf674f2529" alt="Canon ELPH 310 HS vs Casio EX-Z800 top view buttons comparison Canon ELPH 310 HS vs Casio EX-Z800 top view buttons comparison"
Canon ELPH 310 HS vs Casio EX-Z800 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizes simply by seeing a spec sheet. The pic here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the ELPH 310 HS and EX-Z800.
As you can see, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can count on the Casio EX-Z800 to produce more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The fresher ELPH 310 HS provides a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4cf4/e4cf4e7fa3b71bfd238bc84d29608c009c5ca700" alt="Canon ELPH 310 HS vs Casio EX-Z800 sensor size comparison Canon ELPH 310 HS vs Casio EX-Z800 sensor size comparison"
Canon ELPH 310 HS vs Casio EX-Z800 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44ad3/44ad317c087a8d6d7578774059dc4b91e1625380" alt="Canon ELPH 310 HS vs Casio EX-Z800 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon ELPH 310 HS vs Casio EX-Z800 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Canon ELPH 310 HS vs Casio EX-Z800 Specifications
Canon ELPH 310 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Casio |
Model type | Canon ELPH 310 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 |
Also called | IXUS 230 HS | - |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2011-08-23 | 2010-08-03 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | PureColor II G TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 140 gr (0.31 pounds) | 124 gr (0.27 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-4L | NP-120 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $400 | $150 |