Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Casio EX-Z400
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.9) lens
- 206g - 99 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched March 2012
- Additionally Known as IXUS 1100 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Canon ELPH 510 HS and Casio EX-Z400, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Canon and Casio. The image resolution of the ELPH 510 HS (12MP) and the EX-Z400 (12MP) is fairly similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe ELPH 510 HS was announced 3 years later than the EX-Z400 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Canon ELPH 510 HS being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the ELPH 510 HS matches up versus the EX-Z400 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon ELPH 510 HS & Casio Exilim EX-Z400. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon ELPH 510 HS Gallery & Casio EX-Z400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 510 HS over the Casio EX-Z400
| ELPH 510 HS | EX-Z400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2012 | January 2009 | Fresher by 39 months | |
| Display size | 3.2" | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Canon ELPH 510 HS
| EX-Z400 | ELPH 510 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon ELPH 510 HS and Casio EX-Z400
| ELPH 510 HS | EX-Z400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon ELPH 510 HS has got physical measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Casio EX-Z400 has dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs).
Analyze the Canon ELPH 510 HS and Casio EX-Z400 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the ELPH 510 HS against the EX-Z400.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the ELPH 510 HS and EX-Z400 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing simply by going over technical specs. The photograph below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the ELPH 510 HS and EX-Z400.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical megapixels so you can expect similar quality of pictures but you should always take the age of the products into consideration. The newer ELPH 510 HS should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Specifications
| Canon ELPH 510 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Casio |
| Model type | Canon ELPH 510 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 |
| Also Known as | IXUS 1100 HS | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2012-03-01 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-5.9 | f/2.6-7.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.2 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 1/2 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) | 130 gr (0.29 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NB-9L | NP-40 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $200 | $0 |