Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Samsung HZ15W
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37
90 Imaging
34 Features
31 Overall
32
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Samsung HZ15W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.9) lens
- 206g - 99 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced March 2012
- Alternative Name is IXUS 1100 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Released February 2009
- Additionally referred to as WB550
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Samsung HZ15W Overview
Its time to look closer at the Canon ELPH 510 HS versus Samsung HZ15W, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Canon and Samsung. The image resolution of the ELPH 510 HS (12MP) and the HZ15W (12MP) is very well matched and they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe ELPH 510 HS was manufactured 3 years after the HZ15W which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the ELPH 510 HS matches up versus the HZ15W when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Samsung HZ15W Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon ELPH 510 HS & Samsung HZ15W. The entire galleries are provided at Canon ELPH 510 HS Gallery & Samsung HZ15W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 510 HS over the Samsung HZ15W
| ELPH 510 HS | HZ15W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2012 | February 2009 | Newer by 37 months | |
| Display dimension | 3.2" | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ15W over the Canon ELPH 510 HS
| HZ15W | ELPH 510 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 510 HS and Samsung HZ15W
| ELPH 510 HS | HZ15W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Samsung HZ15W Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Canon ELPH 510 HS provides physical dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ15W has sizing of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Analyze the Canon ELPH 510 HS versus Samsung HZ15W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the ELPH 510 HS and the HZ15W.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the ELPH 510 HS and HZ15W is 93 and 90 respectively.
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Samsung HZ15W Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by checking technical specs. The picture underneath will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the ELPH 510 HS and HZ15W.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact resolution and you can expect similar quality of files however you will need to take the age of the products into consideration. The fresher ELPH 510 HS will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Samsung HZ15W Specifications
| Canon ELPH 510 HS | Samsung HZ15W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Samsung |
| Model type | Canon ELPH 510 HS | Samsung HZ15W |
| Also called as | IXUS 1100 HS | WB550 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-03-01 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.9 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3.2 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lb) | 249 grams (0.55 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NB-9L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $200 | $330 |