Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A7R III
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
63 Imaging
78 Features
93 Overall
84
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A7R III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Push to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 657g - 127 x 96 x 74mm
- Released October 2017
- Previous Model is Sony A7R II
- Replacement is Sony A7R IV
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A7R III Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony A7R III, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and A7R III (42MP) and the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and A7R III (Full frame) use totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-2 iHS was released 5 years before the A7R III which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A7R III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the TG-2 iHS matches up against the A7R III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A7R III Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Sony Alpha A7R III. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Sony A7R III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Sony A7R III
TG-2 iHS | A7R III |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A7R III over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
A7R III | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2017 | June 2013 | Newer by 52 months | |
Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1440k | 610k | Clearer screen (+830k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony A7R III
TG-2 iHS | A7R III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A7R III Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-2 iHS provides exterior dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Sony A7R III has specifications of 127mm x 96mm x 74mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.9") with a weight of 657 grams (1.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony A7R III in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the TG-2 iHS versus the A7R III.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-2 iHS and A7R III is 91 and 63 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A7R III Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to see the difference between sensor dimensions simply by checking a spec sheet. The image underneath might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-2 iHS and A7R III.
Clearly, both cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The TG-2 iHS featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Sony A7R III will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 30MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged TG-2 iHS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A7R III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A7R III Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Alpha A7R III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Alpha A7R III |
Type | Waterproof | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2013-06-28 | 2017-10-25 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 42MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 7952 x 5304 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 32000 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 425 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 610k dots | 1,440k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,686k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | - | Off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1(5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lb) | 657 gr (1.45 lb) |
Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 127 x 96 x 74mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 100 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 26.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 3523 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 650 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | - | Two SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II support on one) |
Card slots | One | Two |
Cost at launch | $380 | $2,800 |