Clicky

Canon 4000D vs Olympus E-520

Portability
69
Imaging
63
Features
52
Overall
58
Canon EOS 4000D front
 
Olympus E-520 front
Portability
68
Imaging
44
Features
45
Overall
44

Canon 4000D vs Olympus E-520 Key Specs

Canon 4000D
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Canon EF/EF-S Mount
  • 436g - 129 x 102 x 77mm
  • Introduced February 2018
Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Launched August 2008
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-510
Photography Glossary

Canon 4000D vs Olympus E-520 Overview

On this page, we will be analyzing the Canon 4000D versus Olympus E-520, both Entry-Level DSLR cameras by rivals Canon and Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the 4000D (18MP) and E-520 (10MP) and the 4000D (APS-C) and E-520 (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor sizing.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The 4000D was revealed 9 years later than the E-520 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact SLR).

Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short view of how the 4000D grades vs the E-520 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Canon 4000D over the Olympus E-520

 4000D E-520 
LaunchedFebruary 2018August 2008More recent by 116 months

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Canon 4000D

 E-520 4000D 

Common features in the Canon 4000D and Olympus E-520

 4000D E-520 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions2.7"2.7"Equal screen measurement
Screen resolution230k230kThe same screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Canon 4000D vs Olympus E-520 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon 4000D offers external dimensions of 129mm x 102mm x 77mm (5.1" x 4.0" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 436 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-520 has measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs).

Look at the Canon 4000D versus Olympus E-520 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the 4000D vs the E-520.

Canon 4000D vs Olympus E-520 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the 4000D and E-520 is 69 and 68 respectively.

Canon 4000D vs Olympus E-520 top view buttons comparison

Canon 4000D vs Olympus E-520 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements simply by looking through specifications. The graphic here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the 4000D and E-520.

Plainly, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The 4000D using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Canon 4000D will render more detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger 4000D will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Canon 4000D vs Olympus E-520 sensor size comparison

Canon 4000D vs Olympus E-520 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon 4000D vs Olympus E-520 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon 4000D as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-520 as a Portrait photography camera
77
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (18MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
includes face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
58
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
low resolution sensor (10MP)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Canon 4000D Street photography details
Olympus E-520 Street photography details
60
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
65
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
no articulating screen
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon 4000D
Sports photography with Olympus E-520
60
sensor resolution is decent (18 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
includes tracking focus
supports phase detect autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
bad battery (500 CIPA)
55
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
great battery pack (650 shots)
supports phase detect autofocus
max frames per second low (4.0 frames per second)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Canon 4000D as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-520 as a Travel photography camera
56
sensor resolution is decent (18MP)
has built in flash
no Timelapse recording
bad battery (500 CIPA)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
52
great battery pack (650 CIPA)
built-in flash
no Time Lapse function
low resolution sensor (10MP)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Canon 4000D as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-520 as a Landscape photography camera
59
has manual focus
swap lenses (Canon EF/EF-S mount)
sensor resolution is decent (18 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
screen is small (2.7 inch)
does not have image stabilization
bad battery (500 per charge)
no Timelapse recording
57
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
great battery pack (650 per charge)
screen is small (2.7")
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
no Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Canon 4000D
Vlogging with Olympus E-520
28
includes face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
no microphone socket
9
no video recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Canon 4000D vs Olympus E-520 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon 4000D and Olympus E-520
 Canon EOS 4000DOlympus E-520
General Information
Make Canon Olympus
Model Canon EOS 4000D Olympus E-520
Class Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2018-02-26 2008-08-20
Physical type Compact SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Digic 4+ -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 22.3 x 14.9mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 332.3mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 18MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 5184 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 6400 1600
Highest enhanced ISO 12800 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 9 3
Lens
Lens mounting type Canon EF/EF-S Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 326 45
Crop factor 1.6 2.1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.46x
Features
Min shutter speed 30 seconds 60 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 9.20 m (at ISO 100) 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 46 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 436g (0.96 lb) 552g (1.22 lb)
Physical dimensions 129 x 102 x 77mm (5.1" x 4.0" x 3.0") 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 55
DXO Color Depth score not tested 21.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.4
DXO Low light score not tested 548
Other
Battery life 500 photos 650 photos
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Card slots One One
Launch price $293 $400