Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
72 Imaging
32 Features
32 Overall
32
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus TG-830 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof and both are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SP-565UZ was announced 5 years prior to the TG-830 iHS which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the SP-565UZ scores against the TG-830 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-565UZ & Olympus TG-830 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery & Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| SP-565UZ | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| TG-830 iHS | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 | January 2009 | Newer by 48 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus TG-830 iHS
| SP-565UZ | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-565UZ offers exterior measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Olympus TG-830 iHS has dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus TG-830 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the SP-565UZ vs the TG-830 iHS.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-565UZ and TG-830 iHS is 72 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions just by checking out a spec sheet. The picture here will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-565UZ and TG-830 iHS.
Clearly, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-830 iHS to provide extra detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-01-15 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 413 grams (0.91 lbs) | 214 grams (0.47 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 30 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 18.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 68 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $400 | $0 |