Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
72 Imaging
32 Features
32 Overall
32
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2013
Photography Glossary Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus TG-830 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof and both are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SP-565UZ was announced 5 years prior to the TG-830 iHS which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the SP-565UZ scores against the TG-830 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-565UZ & Olympus TG-830 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery & Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| SP-565UZ | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| TG-830 iHS | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 | January 2009 | Newer by 48 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus TG-830 iHS
| SP-565UZ | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-565UZ offers exterior measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Olympus TG-830 iHS has dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus TG-830 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the SP-565UZ vs the TG-830 iHS.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-565UZ and TG-830 iHS is 72 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions just by checking out a spec sheet. The picture here will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-565UZ and TG-830 iHS.
Clearly, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-830 iHS to provide extra detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-01-15 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 413 grams (0.91 lbs) | 214 grams (0.47 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 30 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 18.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 68 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $400 | $0 |