Clicky

Canon 400D vs Olympus E-PM2

Portability
69
Imaging
47
Features
33
Overall
41
Canon EOS 400D front
 
Olympus PEN E-PM2 front
Portability
89
Imaging
51
Features
63
Overall
55

Canon 400D vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs

Canon 400D
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Canon EF/EF-S Mount
  • 556g - 127 x 94 x 65mm
  • Introduced October 2006
  • Also referred to as EOS Digital Rebel XTi / EOS Kiss Digital X
  • Superseded the Canon 350D
  • New Model is Canon 450D
Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Introduced May 2013
  • Old Model is Olympus E-PM1
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon 400D vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview

Following is a in-depth review of the Canon 400D versus Olympus E-PM2, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Canon and Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the 400D (10MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) and the 400D (APS-C) and E-PM2 (Four Thirds) enjoy totally different sensor size.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The 400D was announced 7 years prior to the E-PM2 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Canon 400D being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the 400D matches up versus the E-PM2 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Canon 400D over the Olympus E-PM2

 400D E-PM2 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Canon 400D

 E-PM2 400D 
IntroducedMay 2013October 2006More modern by 80 months
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Canon 400D and Olympus E-PM2

 400D E-PM2 
Manually focus More accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Canon 400D vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon 400D offers outer dimensions of 127mm x 94mm x 65mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 556 grams (1.23 lbs) and the Olympus E-PM2 has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).

See the Canon 400D versus Olympus E-PM2 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the 400D vs the E-PM2.

Canon 400D vs Olympus E-PM2 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the 400D and E-PM2 is 69 and 89 respectively.

Canon 400D vs Olympus E-PM2 top view buttons comparison

Canon 400D vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizes just by seeing technical specs. The picture below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the 400D and E-PM2.

As you have seen, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The 400D with its larger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-PM2 will show extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged 400D will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Canon 400D vs Olympus E-PM2 sensor size comparison

Canon 400D vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon 400D vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon 400D Portrait photography highlights
Olympus E-PM2 Portrait photography highlights
52
focusing manually
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
does not have liveview
low megapixels (10MP)
70
you can focus manually
decent MP (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Canon 400D Street photography advice
Olympus E-PM2 Street photography advice
57
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
79
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
features focus by touch
good high ISO (25,600)
no moving screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon 400D
Sports photography with Olympus E-PM2
40
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
65
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
lacks phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Canon 400D as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-PM2 as a Travel photography camera
47
has built in flash
missing Timelapse mode
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
65
features focus by touch
decent MP (16 megapixels)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Canon 400D Landscape photography features
Olympus E-PM2 Landscape photography features
47
focusing manually
switch lenses (Canon EF/EF-S mount)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
screen is small (2.5 inch)
does not have liveview
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
missing Timelapse mode
73
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent MP (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Canon 400D as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-PM2 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video recording
36
touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon 400D vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon 400D and Olympus E-PM2
 Canon EOS 400DOlympus PEN E-PM2
General Information
Brand Name Canon Olympus
Model Canon EOS 400D Olympus PEN E-PM2
Alternative name EOS Digital Rebel XTi / EOS Kiss Digital X -
Type Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2006-10-14 2013-05-21
Body design Compact SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 22.2 x 14.8mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 328.6mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 3888 x 2592 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 200
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 9 35
Lens
Lens mounting type Canon EF/EF-S Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 326 107
Crop factor 1.6 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.5x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30s 60s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps 8.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 12.00 m (ISO 100) 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1)
Flash options Auto, On, Red-eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/200s 1/250s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 556g (1.23 pounds) 269g (0.59 pounds)
Dimensions 127 x 94 x 65mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.6") 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 62 72
DXO Color Depth score 22.1 22.7
DXO Dynamic range score 11.0 12.2
DXO Low light score 664 932
Other
Battery life - 360 shots
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model - BLS-5
Self timer Yes (10 sec (2 sec with mirror lock-up)) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $600 $448