Canon 400D vs Ricoh WG-4
69 Imaging
48 Features
33 Overall
42
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Canon 400D vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Canon EF/EF-S Mount
- 556g - 127 x 94 x 65mm
- Announced October 2006
- Additionally Known as EOS Digital Rebel XTi / EOS Kiss Digital X
- Older Model is Canon 350D
- Replacement is Canon 450D
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
Canon 400D vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Canon 400D vs Ricoh WG-4, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the 400D (10MP) and WG-4 (16MP) and the 400D (APS-C) and WG-4 (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe 400D was introduced 8 years prior to the WG-4 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Canon 400D being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the 400D scores versus the WG-4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Canon 400D vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon EOS 400D & Ricoh WG-4. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon 400D Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon 400D over the Ricoh WG-4
400D | WG-4 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Canon 400D
WG-4 | 400D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | October 2006 | More recent by 89 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon 400D and Ricoh WG-4
400D | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Canon 400D vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Canon 400D comes with physical measurements of 127mm x 94mm x 65mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 556 grams (1.23 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Canon 400D vs Ricoh WG-4 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the 400D compared to the WG-4.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the 400D and WG-4 is 69 and 90 respectively.
Canon 400D vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to imagine the difference between sensor measurements just by looking at technical specs. The visual here might provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the 400D and WG-4.
As you can tell, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The 400D having a larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Ricoh WG-4 will give you greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images more aggressively. The older 400D is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Canon 400D vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon 400D vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
Canon EOS 400D | Ricoh WG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Ricoh |
Model type | Canon EOS 400D | Ricoh WG-4 |
Also called as | EOS Digital Rebel XTi / EOS Kiss Digital X | - |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Announced | 2006-10-14 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 22.2 x 14.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 328.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3888 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Canon EF/EF-S | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 326 | - |
Crop factor | 1.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.5x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (ISO 100) | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Red-eye reduction, Off | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/200 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 556 gr (1.23 pounds) | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 127 x 94 x 65mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 62 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 664 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec (2 sec with mirror lock-up)) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $600 | $330 |