Canon 60Da vs Samsung ST700
59 Imaging
58 Features
80 Overall
66
99 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Canon 60Da vs Samsung ST700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Increase to 12800)
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF/EF-S Mount
- 755g - 145 x 106 x 79mm
- Introduced April 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 99 x 55 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon 60Da vs Samsung ST700 Overview
Following is a detailed review of the Canon 60Da and Samsung ST700, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Canon and Samsung. The resolution of the 60Da (18MP) and the ST700 (16MP) is pretty close but the 60Da (APS-C) and ST700 (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe 60Da was released 16 months after the ST700 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras come with different body type with the Canon 60Da being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung ST700 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the 60Da matches up against the ST700 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon 60Da vs Samsung ST700 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon EOS 60Da and Samsung ST700. The complete galleries are available at Canon 60Da Gallery and Samsung ST700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon 60Da over the Samsung ST700
| 60Da | ST700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2012 | January 2011 | More modern by 16 months | |
| Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST700 over the Canon 60Da
| ST700 | 60Da | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon 60Da and Samsung ST700
| 60Da | ST700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Canon 60Da vs Samsung ST700 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Canon 60Da comes with outer measurements of 145mm x 106mm x 79mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.1") along with a weight of 755 grams (1.66 lbs) and the Samsung ST700 has specifications of 99mm x 55mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Analyze the Canon 60Da and Samsung ST700 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the 60Da against the ST700.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 60Da and ST700 is 59 and 99 respectively.
Canon 60Da vs Samsung ST700 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes simply by looking through specs. The picture underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the 60Da and ST700.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The 60Da because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Canon 60Da will render extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The younger 60Da provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Canon 60Da vs Samsung ST700 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon 60Da vs Samsung ST700 Specifications
| Canon EOS 60Da | Samsung ST700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Samsung |
| Model type | Canon EOS 60Da | Samsung ST700 |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2012-04-07 | 2011-01-05 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | - |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Canon EF/EF-S | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | () |
| Amount of lenses | 326 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | Clear View TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 96 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.6x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (29.97, 25, 23.976 fps), 1280 x 720 (59.94, 50 fps), 640 x 480 (59.94, 50 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 755 gr (1.66 pounds) | - |
| Dimensions | 145 x 106 x 79mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.1") | 99 x 55 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 1100 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LP-E6 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, remote) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $1,499 | $280 |