Clicky

Canon 760D vs Olympus E-400

Portability
66
Imaging
66
Features
77
Overall
70
Canon EOS 760D front
 
Olympus E-400 front
Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38

Canon 760D vs Olympus E-400 Key Specs

Canon 760D
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Canon EF/EF-S Mount
  • 565g - 132 x 101 x 78mm
  • Released February 2015
  • Also Known as EOS 760D / EOS 8000D
  • Earlier Model is Canon 700D
Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Introduced September 2006
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-410
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Canon 760D vs Olympus E-400 Overview

Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Canon 760D versus Olympus E-400, both Entry-Level DSLR cameras by rivals Canon and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the 760D (24MP) and E-400 (10MP) and the 760D (APS-C) and E-400 (Four Thirds) posses totally different sensor dimensions.

Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

The 760D was revealed 8 years later than the E-400 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact SLR).

Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summation of how the 760D scores against the E-400 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon 760D over the Olympus E-400

 760D E-400 
IntroducedFebruary 2015September 2006Fresher by 103 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1040k215kSharper screen (+825k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Canon 760D

 E-400 760D 

Common features in the Canon 760D and Olympus E-400

 760D E-400 
Manual focus More exact focus

Canon 760D vs Olympus E-400 Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and size. The Canon 760D features external measurements of 132mm x 101mm x 78mm (5.2" x 4.0" x 3.1") along with a weight of 565 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Olympus E-400 has specifications of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).

Check the Canon 760D versus Olympus E-400 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the 760D vs the E-400.

Canon 760D vs Olympus E-400 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the 760D and E-400 is 66 and 77 respectively.

Canon 760D vs Olympus E-400 top view buttons comparison

Canon 760D vs Olympus E-400 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing simply by researching technical specs. The graphic underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the 760D and E-400.

As you can tell, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The 760D with its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Canon 760D will render greater detail because of its extra 14 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The fresher 760D will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Canon 760D vs Olympus E-400 sensor size comparison

Canon 760D vs Olympus E-400 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon 760D vs Olympus E-400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon 760D Portrait photography features
Olympus E-400 Portrait photography features
79
manual focus
megapixel count good (24MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
provides face detect autofocus
exports RAW files
46
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
does not have liveview
manual exposure not possible
resolution not great (10MP)
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

Street Comparison

Canon 760D Street photography highlights
Olympus E-400 Street photography highlights
71
screen can move to multiple angles
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
comes with focus via touch
lack of image stabilization
60
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

Sports Comparison

Canon 760D as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-400 as a Sports photography camera
61
megapixel count good (24MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
provides tracking focus
comes with phase detect autofocus
max fps low (5.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
terrible battery power (440 per charge)
38
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
does not have liveview
max frames per second low (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (10MP)
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Canon 760D
Travel photography with Olympus E-400
66
comes with focus via touch
megapixel count good (24 megapixels)
flash built-in
selfie friendly display
doesn't have Timelapse function
terrible battery power (440 shots)
49
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse function
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly display
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Canon 760D
Landscape photography with Olympus E-400
66
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Canon EF/EF-S mount)
nice screen size (3")
megapixel count good (24 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
lack of image stabilization
terrible battery power (440 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse function
45
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
does not have liveview
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
does not have Time Lapse function
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Vlogging Comparison

Canon 760D Vlogging info
Olympus E-400 Vlogging info
72
selfie friendly display
touchscreen
provides face detect autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does have microphone jack
lack of image stabilization
9
no video
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

Canon 760D vs Olympus E-400 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon 760D and Olympus E-400
 Canon EOS 760DOlympus E-400
General Information
Make Canon Olympus
Model type Canon EOS 760D Olympus E-400
Otherwise known as EOS 760D / EOS 8000D -
Type Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2015-02-06 2006-09-14
Body design Compact SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor DIGIC 6 -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 22.3 x 14.9mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 332.3mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 6000 x 4000 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 12800 1600
Maximum enhanced ISO 25600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 19 3
Cross type focus points 19 -
Lens
Lens mount type Canon EF/EF-S Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 326 45
Crop factor 1.6 2.1
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 2.5 inch
Resolution of display 1,040k dot 215k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.51x 0.46x
Features
Min shutter speed 30 secs 60 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 5.0 frames per sec 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 10.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings - Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) -
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 565g (1.25 pounds) 435g (0.96 pounds)
Physical dimensions 132 x 101 x 78mm (5.2" x 4.0" x 3.1") 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 70 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 22.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.0 not tested
DXO Low light rating 915 not tested
Other
Battery life 440 photographs -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID LP-E17 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I compatible) Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Storage slots One One
Price at release $849 $599