Canon 7D MII vs FujiFilm F70EXR
55 Imaging
62 Features
80 Overall
69
93 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Canon 7D MII vs FujiFilm F70EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000 (Raise to 51200)
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF/EF-S Mount
- 910g - 149 x 112 x 78mm
- Launched September 2014
- Superseded the Canon 7D
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-270mm (F3.3-5.6) lens
- 205g - 99 x 59 x 23mm
- Announced July 2009
- Alternate Name is FinePix F75EXR
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon 7D Mark II vs. FujiFilm FinePix F70EXR: A Deep Dive Comparison from a Seasoned Photographer’s Perspective
In my 15-plus years testing cameras - from delicate mirrorless systems to rugged pro-grade DSLRs - I’ve encountered devices spanning incredible technological leaps. Two cameras like the Canon EOS 7D Mark II and the FujiFilm FinePix F70EXR epitomize disparate ends of the photographic spectrum. One is a powerhouse mid-size DSLR aimed at enthusiasts and pros, and the other a compact point-and-shoot designed for casual shooters seeking reach in a pocketable shell.
Today, I’m pulling back the curtain with an honest, experience-driven comparison of these two models. I’ve extensively tested both, fielding them through portrait sessions, wildlife chases, street explorations, and even nighttime shooting. My goal is straightforward: arm you, fellow photographer and photo enthusiast, with real-world insight to help you decide which camera better suits your creative lifestyle and budget.
Let’s begin this journey by placing these very different beasts side by side - literally.
Putting Size and Ergonomics Under the Microscope
With DSLRs and compacts, physical form matters greatly. Not just for lugging around, but for intuitive handling and responsiveness when moments unfold fast.

The Canon 7D MII tips the scales at about 910 grams - more than four times heavier than the FujiFilm F70EXR, which weighs only about 205 grams. Measuring 149x112x78mm, the 7D Mark II’s substantial grip and robust build scream “professional tool.” It feels reassuringly solid, made to withstand long hours and rough handling, with weather sealing for resilience against dust and moisture.
In contrast, the FujiFilm’s slim compact dimensions (99x59x23mm) make it highly pocketable, ideal for spontaneous street photography or travel where every gram counts. The ergonomics here are minimal - just enough buttons for basic control - yet the lightweight design invites casual shooting without fatigue.
If you value tactile control, shutter feedback, and a camera that feels like an extension of your hand, the Canon’s heft and grip win hands-down. Yet if discretion, portability, and easy carry-topocket convenience rank higher for you, Fuji’s small size is compelling.
Design and Control Layout: Finding Your Operational Flow
Handling a camera intuitively reduces missed shots and boosts creative spontaneity. Let’s analyze these two in terms of control placement and usability.

The 7D Mark II sports a classic DSLR layout, crafted with the enthusiast and pro in mind. Multiple dials allow quick access to aperture, shutter speed, ISO, and exposure compensation - all critical for precise manual exposure control. Buttons are well spaced, easy to locate by feel, and include a top LCD panel for quick status checks without lowering the camera.
The FujiFilm F70EXR’s top panel is far simpler. With limited physical dials and buttons, it’s designed for straightforward point-and-shoot operation. Most settings require menu diving, which can slow you down if you want to tweak on-the-fly.
From my experience, if manual controls and shooting speed are priorities - think wildlife outings or sports events - the Canon’s control layout delivers a clear edge. Fuji’s design is more suited for casual users not concerned with instant access to advanced settings.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of Photography
Image quality stems largely from sensor size, resolution, and processing technology. Let’s unpack how the 7D Mark II and F70EXR compare on this vital front.

Canon’s APS-C CMOS sensor measures 22.4x15mm, offering 20 megapixels of resolution. The DIGIC 6 dual processor optimizes image readout, noise reduction, and dynamic range management - resulting in high-fidelity RAW files with decent ISO latitude. Its APS-C sensor size substantially outperforms the tiny 1/2" CCD sensor (6.4x4.8mm) of the FujiFilm, which delivers only 10 megapixels.
This sensor size discrepancy explains the major difference in image quality potential. The 7D Mark II yields cleaner images with more detail, better low-light performance (native ISO can go up to 16,000 and expanded to 51,200), and superior dynamic range - essential for landscapes that reveal intricate shadow and highlight detail.
In contrast, the Fuji’s small sensor is limited in noise control at higher ISOs and restricts depth of field control, leading to less creamy bokeh. Its 10x zoom lens provides excellent reach but at the cost of lens speed (f/3.3-5.6) and optical sharpness, especially at the long end.
In practical shooting for portraits, landscapes, or low-light scenes, the Canon’s sensor will produce images with richer tonal gradation, smoother skin tones, and more flexibility in post-processing.
Viewing and Composing: Interface and Screen Experience
Composing crucial moments requires a dependable viewfinder or LCD. Both cameras differ significantly here.

The Canon 7D Mark II offers a bright 3-inch fixed LCD with 1,040k-dot resolution - crisp and detailed. Its optical pentaprism viewfinder offers 100% frame coverage and 0.63x magnification, giving an accurate real-world preview of composition. Pro photographers often prefer optical viewfinders for their clarity, zero lag, and stability when tracking fast-moving subjects.
The FujiFilm provides a smaller 2.7-inch LCD with 230k-dot resolution but lacks any viewfinder at all. Composing solely on this screen under bright sun can be challenging, and the lower resolution LCD means details look softer on playback.
If you shoot wildlife or sports requiring quick autofocus and framing through a viewfinder, the Canon’s viewfinder is a major advantage. Street photographers or travelers might find Fuji’s LCD-only viewfinder acceptable given the camera’s size.
Autofocus and Speed: Never Miss the Moment
Autofocus (AF) system performance can make or break action photography. Here, the 7D MII and F70EXR are on different leagues again.
The Canon 7D Mark II features a sophisticated 65-point all cross-type AF system with excellent eye detection and continuous tracking. During my wildlife and sports trials, this autofocus excelled in locking quickly on moving subjects, maintaining focus through bursts at up to 10fps. Its phase-detection AF performs superbly both in daylight and varied lighting conditions.
FujiFilm’s point-and-shoot relies on contrast-detection AF, which is slower and less reliable for tracking motion. Continuous AF is available but limited, and it offers only a 5fps burst rate at sub-HD video resolution. It lacks face or eye detection, which modern users might miss for portraits.
Thus, for demanding subjects such as birds in flight, erratic children, or athletes, the Canon outpaces the Fuji significantly in speed and accuracy.
Real-World Versatility Across Photography Genres
Let me walk you through how these two cameras perform across major photographic disciplines.
Portraiture: Skin Tones, Bokeh, and Eye Detection
In portrait sessions, I found the 7D Mark II’s larger sensor and 65-point AF delivered pleasingly smooth skin tones and sharp focus where it mattered - typically the subject’s eyes. The Canon’s ability to mount a wide range of EF/EF-S lenses means pairing with fast primes (like an 85mm f/1.8) is straightforward, enabling creamy background separation.
The FujiFilm struggled here. Its small sensor limits natural bokeh, and the fixed lens’s relatively narrow aperture constrains background blur. Without eye-detection AF, critical focus on eyes was sometimes missed, leading to less impactful portraits.
Landscape: Dynamic Range and Weather Readiness
For landscapes, the Canon’s 11.8 EV dynamic range from DxOMark test scores and 20MP resolution provide excellent detail, preservation of highlights, and shadow recovery latitude. Plus, its weather sealing lets you shoot confidently in misty or dusty environments.
The FujiFilm’s small sensor and lack of weatherproofing make it less suitable for challenging outdoor conditions. Resolution caps at 10MP, but its 27-270mm lens offers flexibility in framing wide vistas or distant peaks.
Wildlife: Telephoto Reach and Burst Rates
Here, the Fuji’s 10x zoom lens is tempting for casual wildlife shooters who want reach without changing lenses. However, its f/5.6 max aperture at the tele end and weaker AF make capturing quick action frustrating.
The Canon, paired with longer EF telephoto lenses, delivers faster, more accurate autofocus, burst shooting at 10fps to capture sequences, and superior image quality. Its robust buffer accommodates long bursts in RAW. Overall, the 7D MII is the clear winner for serious wildlife enthusiasts.
Here are sample images shot side-by-side in a controlled session - notice the Canon’s sharper detail, dynamic range, and more natural color rendition versus the Fuji’s more compressed look with slightly muted colors.
Sports: Frame Rates and Tracking Performance
Sports photography demands high-speed continuous shooting and rock-solid autofocus tracking.
At 10fps burst rates, the Canon 7D MII matches many pro-level DSLRs, and its extensive AF points track athletes swiftly across the frame. Its rugged build also inspires confidence during fast-paced events.
The Fuji only manages 5fps in JPEG, and lacks phase-detect AF or specialized tracking modes. For fast-moving sports, the reliability and speed of the 7D Mark II is indispensable.
Street Photography: Discretion and Portability
For snapshots of urban life, FujiFilm’s small size and light weight offer strong advantages. Its quiet operation and unobtrusive profile help photograph candid moments without drawing attention.
Conversely, the 7D MII’s bulk and louder shutter might intimidate some street subjects and slow down spontaneous shooting. However, its greater control and image quality can reward patient street photographers aiming for higher-fidelity results.
Macro Photography: Focusing Precision and Stabilization
While the Canon lacks built-in image stabilization in the body, many EF lenses include optical stabilization, and its precise AF system helps nail critical focus. For macro, using dedicated close-up lenses on the 7D Mk II yields better magnification and detail.
The Fuji includes sensor-shift stabilization, useful for hand-held macro shots at lower shutter speeds. However, its fixed lens limits the true magnification possible.
Night and Astrophotography: ISO and Noise Control
Astrophotography pushes cameras to extremes. The Canon’s sensor excels here, with ISO up to 16,000 and reasonable noise handling. I’ve successfully captured starscapes and milky way scenes with it, where dynamic range and thermal noise suppression were critical.
The Fuji’s tiny sensor produces noisy results above ISO 400-800, limiting long exposure and star shot potential.
Video Capabilities: What They Bring to the Table
Videographers will find the Canon 7D Mark II more capable. It records Full HD 1080p at multiple frame rates including 24fps and 60fps, supports external microphones and headphones via ports, and outputs clean HDMI. The DIGIC 6 processors enable better video quality and noise control.
In contrast, the FujiFilm tops out at VGA resolution (640x480) at 30fps, with no external audio inputs or HDMI output. Video quality and controls are basic, suitable for casual clips but not professional or semiprofessional use.
Travel Photography: Versatility and Battery Life
For packing light, FujiFilm’s compact design and 10x zoom make it an all-in-one travel camera. Its battery life is less documented but generally sufficient for casual use due to low power demand.
The Canon 7D Mark II offers high battery endurance (approx. 670 shots per charge) and dual card slots for extended shooting and backup. But its size and weight are a consideration for minimalists.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Durability in the Field
Canon’s magnesium alloy body with weather sealing protects internal electronics against dust and moisture - essential for outdoor work in unpredictable conditions.
FujiFilm’s plastic, unstressed body lacks weather resistance, making it more vulnerable in rough environments.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility
The Canon EF/EF-S mount opens up access to over 300 quality lenses - from fast primes to pro-level telephoto zooms. This lens availability guarantees usability for nearly all photographic genres and budgets.
The FujiFinePix’s fixed lens cannot be swapped, limiting creative flexibility and optical upgrades.
Connectivity and Storage Options
The Canon includes dual storage slots (CompactFlash + SD), USB 3.0, HDMI, and GPS built-in - facilitating fast file transfers and geo-tagging.
The FujiFilm offers single SD card slot and USB 2.0 only, with no wireless connectivity or GPS.
Price and Value: Does the Cost Match Performance?
At around $1086 new, the Canon 7D Mark II represents a solid investment into a professional-grade APS-C DSLR system. Its speed, image quality, and build justify this price for enthusiasts or pros.
The FujiFilm F70EXR, priced near $280 new, appeals as an affordable high-zoom compact with basic imaging needs. Its value lies in convenience rather than performance.
These DxOMark scores and genre-oriented performance charts reinforce that the Canon 7D Mark II ranks highly in sensor performance, burst speed, and autofocus capabilities across most photography types, while the FujiFilm is best suited for casual snapshots and travel.
My Bottom Line and Recommendations
After thoroughly testing both cameras in varied real-world contexts, my conclusions are nuanced:
-
Choose the Canon 7D Mark II if you are a photography enthusiast or professional who demands superior image quality, fast and reliable autofocus, rugged reliability, and a vast lens ecosystem. It excels at portraits, wildlife, sports, landscapes, and low-light work. This camera deserves consideration for serious creative or commercial photography.
-
Choose the FujiFilm FinePix F70EXR if you want an ultra-portable, budget-friendly travel or street camera with respectable zoom reach and basic photography features. It’s for casual users who prioritize convenience and light weight above image perfection.
Final tip: If your budget allows, invest in the Canon ecosystem for long-term growth and creative flexibility. If you want a point-and-shoot companion for snapshots and travel, FujiFilm is a cost-effective entry.
In my years on the road and in the studio, pairing the right camera to your shooting style matters more than specs alone. Think about what genres inspire you most. Then pick accordingly - because the best camera is always the one you have ready in your hands when the magic unfolds.
I hope this deep dive comparison helps illuminate the strengths and limitations of these very different cameras. Feel free to reach out with your questions or photo projects you'd like advice on - I’m always eager to engage with fellow shutterbugs on harnessing camera tech to make compelling images.
Happy shooting!
Canon 7D MII vs FujiFilm F70EXR Specifications
| Canon EOS 7D Mark II | FujiFilm FinePix F70EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model | Canon EOS 7D Mark II | FujiFilm FinePix F70EXR |
| Alternate name | - | FinePix F75EXR |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2014-09-15 | 2009-07-22 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 6 (dual) | EXR |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2" |
| Sensor measurements | 22.4 x 15mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 336.0mm² | 30.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 3616 x 2712 |
| Highest native ISO | 16000 | 12800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 65 | - |
| Cross focus points | 65 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Canon EF/EF-S | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 27-270mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Amount of lenses | 326 | - |
| Crop factor | 1.6 | 5.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.63x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (59.94, 50. 29.97, 25, 24, 23.98 fps), 1280 x 720 (59.94, 50, 29.97, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (29.97, 25 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 910 gr (2.01 lb) | 205 gr (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 149 x 112 x 78mm (5.9" x 4.4" x 3.1") | 99 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 70 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.8 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 1082 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 670 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LP-E6N | NP-50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | CompactFlash + SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC Internal |
| Storage slots | Dual | Single |
| Pricing at release | $1,086 | $280 |