Canon M vs Olympus E-P2
89 Imaging
58 Features
65 Overall
60
86 Imaging
46 Features
42 Overall
44
Canon M vs Olympus E-P2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 298g - 109 x 66 x 32mm
- Announced July 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Announced April 2010
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-P1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-P3
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon M vs Olympus E-P2 Overview
Below is a in depth overview of the Canon M vs Olympus E-P2, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by competitors Canon and Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the M (18MP) and E-P2 (12MP) and the M (APS-C) and E-P2 (Four Thirds) posses totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe M was brought out 2 years later than the E-P2 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the M grades versus the E-P2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon M vs Olympus E-P2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon EOS M & Olympus PEN E-P2. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon M Gallery & Olympus E-P2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M over the Olympus E-P2
| M | E-P2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2012 | April 2010 | More recent by 28 months | |
| Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Canon M
| E-P2 | M |
|---|
Common features in the Canon M and Olympus E-P2
| M | E-P2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Canon M vs Olympus E-P2 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera often, you should factor its weight and volume. The Canon M provides exterior measurements of 109mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 298 grams (0.66 lbs) while the Olympus E-P2 has sizing of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon M vs Olympus E-P2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the M against the E-P2.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the M and E-P2 is 89 and 86 respectively.
Canon M vs Olympus E-P2 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to see the difference in sensor measurements simply by looking through technical specs. The visual here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the M and E-P2.
As you can tell, both of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The M due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Canon M will result in greater detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more modern M will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon M vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon M vs Olympus E-P2 Specifications
| Canon EOS M | Olympus PEN E-P2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon EOS M | Olympus PEN E-P2 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2012-07-23 | 2010-04-22 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 5 | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3456 | 4032 x 3024 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 31 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Canon EF-M | Micro Four Thirds |
| Number of lenses | 23 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | Clear View II TFT LCD | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/200s | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 480 (60, 50 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 298 gr (0.66 lbs) | 355 gr (0.78 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 66 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 65 | 56 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.1 | 21.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light score | 827 | 505 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 shots | 300 shots |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LP-E12 | BLS-1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $510 | $799 |