Canon M200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR
88 Imaging
69 Features
80 Overall
73


90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Canon M200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Released September 2019
- Earlier Model is Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Old Model is Fujifilm F800EXR

Canon M200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Canon M200 versus Fujifilm F900EXR, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Canon and FujiFilm. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.

The M200 was brought out 6 years after the Fujifilm F900EXR which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Canon M200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Fujifilm F900EXR being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the M200 scores against the Fujifilm F900EXR for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Canon M200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Canon EOS M200 & Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR. The entire galleries are provided at Canon M200 Gallery & Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Fujifilm F900EXR
M200 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2019 | ![]() | January 2013 | More modern by 81 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer screen (+120k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Canon M200
Fujifilm F900EXR | M200 |
---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Fujifilm F900EXR
M200 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Canon M200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera, you should factor its weight and volume. The Canon M200 offers outer dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm F900EXR has sizing of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Canon M200 versus Fujifilm F900EXR in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the M200 versus the Fujifilm F900EXR.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M200 and Fujifilm F900EXR is 88 and 90 respectively.

Canon M200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizes only by looking through technical specs. The picture below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the M200 and Fujifilm F900EXR.
As you can tell, the two cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The M200 featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Canon M200 will result in more detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots much more aggressively. The more recent M200 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Canon M200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon M200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Specifications
Canon EOS M200 | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model type | Canon EOS M200 | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2019-09-25 | 2013-01-30 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | DIGIC 8 | EXR II |
Sensor type | CMOS | EXRCMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2" |
Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 30.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 143 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Canon EF-M | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.3 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 23 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 5.6 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.1 frames per second | 11.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 299 gr (0.66 lbs) | 232 gr (0.51 lbs) |
Dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 images | 260 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LP-E12 | NP-50A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $549 | $380 |