Clicky

Canon M200 vs Hasselblad X2D

Portability
88
Imaging
69
Features
80
Overall
73
Canon EOS M200 front
 
Hasselblad X2D 100c front
Portability
56
Imaging
93
Features
78
Overall
87

Canon M200 vs Hasselblad X2D Key Specs

Canon M200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Canon EF-M Mount
  • 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
  • Announced September 2019
  • Older Model is Canon M100
Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
  • 100MP - Medium format Sensor
  • 3.60" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 64 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • Hasselblad X Mount
  • 895g - 149 x 106 x 75mm
  • Revealed September 2022
  • Superseded the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon M200 vs Hasselblad X2D Overview

Its time to look more closely at the Canon M200 vs Hasselblad X2D, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by manufacturers Canon and Hasselblad. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and X2D (100MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and X2D (Medium format) have totally different sensor sizes.

Photography Glossary

The M200 was released 3 years before the X2D which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the M200 matches up vs the X2D in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Hasselblad X2D

 M200 X2D 
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Hasselblad X2D over the Canon M200

 X2D M200 
RevealedSeptember 2022September 2019More modern by 35 months
Screen dimensions3.60"3"Bigger screen (+0.6")
Screen resolution2360k1040kCrisper screen (+1320k dot)

Common features in the Canon M200 and Hasselblad X2D

 M200 X2D 
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Canon M200 vs Hasselblad X2D Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Canon M200 has got outer measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Hasselblad X2D has proportions of 149mm x 106mm x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") along with a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).

Check the Canon M200 vs Hasselblad X2D in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the M200 against the X2D.

Canon M200 vs Hasselblad X2D size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the M200 and X2D is 88 and 56 respectively.

Canon M200 vs Hasselblad X2D top view buttons comparison

Canon M200 vs Hasselblad X2D Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizes only by reading through specs. The image here should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the M200 and X2D.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M200 featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Hasselblad X2D will give you more detail as a result of its extra 76MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged M200 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Canon M200 vs Hasselblad X2D sensor size comparison

Canon M200 vs Hasselblad X2D Screen and ViewFinder

Canon M200 vs Hasselblad X2D Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon M200
Portrait photography with Hasselblad X2D
74
manual focus
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detect focus
delivers RAW formats
external flash not possible
95
has manual focus
flash sync is higher than normal (1/4,000s)
megapixel count high (100 megapixels)
large sensor size (Medium format)
delivers RAW formats
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Canon M200 Street photography information
Hasselblad X2D Street photography information
82
has a tilting screen
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
provides touch focus
good high ISO (25,600)
lack of image stabilization
75
screen tilts
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
large sensor size (Medium format)
delivers RAW formats
comes with focus via touch
weather sealing
above average ISO range (25,600)
more heavy than others (895g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Canon M200 as a Sports photography camera
Hasselblad X2D as a Sports photography camera
74
MP count decent (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
offers tracking focus
comes with phase detect auto focus
lack of image stabilization
90
silent shooting (1/6,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count high (100MP)
large sensor size (Medium format)
supports tracking focus
weather sealing
comes with phase detect AF
slow continuous shooting (3.3 fps)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Canon M200 Travel photography details
Hasselblad X2D Travel photography details
89
connects via bluetooth
provides touch focus
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
built-in flash
screen is selfie friendly
61
weather sealing
comes with focus via touch
megapixel count high (100MP)
does not have Timelapse mode
more heavy than others (895g)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Canon M200 Landscape photography advice
Hasselblad X2D Landscape photography advice
80
manual focus
change lenses (Canon EF-M mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
MP count decent (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
lack of image stabilization
87
has manual focus
change lenses (Hasselblad X mount)
screen larger than average (3.60 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count high (100MP)
large sensor size (Medium format)
above average ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
weather sealing
does not have Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Canon M200 Vlogging info
Hasselblad X2D Vlogging info
75
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen functionality
offers face detect focus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
lack of image stabilization
no mic jack
30
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
does have microphone socket
does not have a selfie friendly screen
low quality video ( resolution)
more heavy than others (895 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon M200 vs Hasselblad X2D Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon M200 and Hasselblad X2D
 Canon EOS M200Hasselblad X2D 100c
General Information
Brand Canon Hasselblad
Model type Canon EOS M200 Hasselblad X2D 100c
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Pro Mirrorless
Announced 2019-09-25 2022-09-07
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor DIGIC 8 -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Medium format
Sensor measurements 22.3 x 14.9mm 44 x 33mm
Sensor surface area 332.3mm² 1,452.0mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 100MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1 and 4:3
Max resolution 6000 x 4000 11656 x 8742
Max native ISO 25600 25600
Min native ISO 100 64
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 143 294
Lens
Lens support Canon EF-M Hasselblad X
Available lenses 23 13
Crop factor 1.6 0.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Tilting
Screen size 3 inch 3.60 inch
Screen resolution 1,040k dots 2,360k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 5,760k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.87x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30s 4080s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Fastest silent shutter speed - 1/6000s
Continuous shutter rate 6.1 frames per second 3.3 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash modes - TTL center weighted system, compatible with Nikon System Flashes
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize - 1/4000s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC -
Max video resolution 3840x2160 -
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 299 grams (0.66 lb) 895 grams (1.97 lb)
Physical dimensions 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") 149 x 106 x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 315 pictures 420 pictures
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LP-E12 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) CFexpress Type B, 1TB Internal Storage
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $549 $8,199