Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P5
88 Imaging
69 Features
80 Overall
73
85 Imaging
53 Features
76 Overall
62
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Revealed September 2019
- Superseded the Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 420g - 122 x 69 x 37mm
- Introduced October 2013
- Replaced the Olympus E-P3
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P5 Overview
The following is a extensive assessment of the Canon M200 and Olympus E-P5, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and E-P5 (16MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and E-P5 (Four Thirds) possess different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe M200 was released 6 years after the E-P5 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the M200 grades vs the E-P5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P5 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon EOS M200 & Olympus PEN E-P5. The complete galleries are provided at Canon M200 Gallery & Olympus E-P5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Olympus E-P5
M200 | E-P5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2019 | October 2013 | Newer by 73 months | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 1037k | Clearer screen (+3k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P5 over the Canon M200
E-P5 | M200 |
---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Olympus E-P5
M200 | E-P5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon M200 has got physical measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) while the Olympus E-P5 has proportions of 122mm x 69mm x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 420 grams (0.93 lbs).
Check out the Canon M200 and Olympus E-P5 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the M200 versus the E-P5.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the M200 and E-P5 is 88 and 85 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P5 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading through technical specs. The pic underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the M200 and E-P5.
As you can tell, the two cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The M200 due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Canon M200 will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The younger M200 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P5 Specifications
Canon EOS M200 | Olympus PEN E-P5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon EOS M200 | Olympus PEN E-P5 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2019-09-25 | 2013-10-03 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | DIGIC 8 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Canon EF-M | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 23 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | 3:2 LCD capacitive touchscreen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.1 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.00 m (ISO 100) |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (1st or 2nd curtain), Manual (1/1 - 1/64) |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/320 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 299g (0.66 lbs) | 420g (0.93 lbs) |
Dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 122 x 69 x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 895 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 pictures | 330 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LP-E12 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $549 | $389 |