Olympus E-600 vs Sony T900
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Olympus E-600 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed February 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-600 vs Sony T900 Overview
The following is a detailed assessment of the Olympus E-600 and Sony T900, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-600 (12MP) and the T900 (12MP) is relatively close but the E-600 (Four Thirds) and T900 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-600 was released 7 months after the T900 so they are of a similar generation. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-600 scores vs the T900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-600 vs Sony T900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-600 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-600 Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Sony T900
| E-600 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2009 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 7 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus E-600
| T900 | E-600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Sony T900
| E-600 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing |
Olympus E-600 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-600 has outer measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) and the Sony T900 has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-600 and Sony T900 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the E-600 versus the T900.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-600 and T900 is 71 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-600 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specs. The image here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-600 and T900.
All in all, each of these cameras provide the same megapixels albeit different sensor dimensions. The E-600 has the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler. The younger E-600 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-600 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-600 vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Olympus E-600 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-600 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2009-08-30 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 7 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 515 grams (1.14 pounds) | 143 grams (0.32 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 541 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $300 |