Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2
88 Imaging
69 Features
80 Overall
73
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06c45/06c45f6f5b846783e631f6931199f2be5a86bfef" alt="Canon EOS M200 front Canon EOS M200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Released September 2019
- Older Model is Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Released May 2013
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PM1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
Here is a complete review of the Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by brands Canon and Olympus. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and E-PM2 (Four Thirds) boast different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The M200 was released 6 years later than the E-PM2 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the M200 grades versus the E-PM2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Canon EOS M200 and Olympus PEN E-PM2. The complete galleries are provided at Canon M200 Gallery and Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Olympus E-PM2
M200 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2019 | ![]() | May 2013 | Fresher by 78 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+580k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Canon M200
E-PM2 | M200 |
---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Olympus E-PM2
M200 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Canon M200 comes with external measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Olympus E-PM2 has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the M200 against the E-PM2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea535/ea5355a2bd8d341ce62816868bc17fa705bee357" alt="Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2 size comparison Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the M200 and E-PM2 is 88 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/766b3/766b310692e85f30dd56be4fcd2b22d341c2e4f0" alt="Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2 top view buttons comparison Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2 top view buttons comparison"
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing simply by checking specifications. The photograph underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the M200 and E-PM2.
Plainly, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The M200 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Canon M200 will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more recent M200 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3e4d/a3e4d16081c0cce2d6f0bf4ad8488d21b6693edc" alt="Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2 sensor size comparison Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2 sensor size comparison"
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed3bf/ed3bf9c0c5b9d9384dbf49545e1b3a79a58987af" alt="Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
Canon EOS M200 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon EOS M200 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2019-09-25 | 2013-05-21 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | DIGIC 8 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Canon EF-M | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 23 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.1 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 299 gr (0.66 lb) | 269 gr (0.59 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 932 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 pictures | 360 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LP-E12 | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $549 | $448 |