Clicky

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2

Portability
88
Imaging
70
Features
80
Overall
74
Canon EOS M200 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PM2 front
Portability
89
Imaging
53
Features
63
Overall
57

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs

Canon M200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Canon EF-M Mount
  • 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
  • Released September 2019
  • Older Model is Canon M100
Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Released May 2013
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-PM1
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview

Here is a complete review of the Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by brands Canon and Olympus. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and E-PM2 (Four Thirds) boast different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The M200 was released 6 years later than the E-PM2 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the M200 grades versus the E-PM2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Olympus E-PM2

 M200 E-PM2 
ReleasedSeptember 2019May 2013Fresher by 78 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k460kClearer screen (+580k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Canon M200

 E-PM2 M200 

Common features in the Canon M200 and Olympus E-PM2

 M200 E-PM2 
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurements
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Canon M200 comes with external measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Olympus E-PM2 has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).

Take a look at the Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the M200 against the E-PM2.

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the M200 and E-PM2 is 88 and 89 respectively.

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2 top view buttons comparison

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing simply by checking specifications. The photograph underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the M200 and E-PM2.

Plainly, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The M200 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Canon M200 will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more recent M200 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2 sensor size comparison

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon M200 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-PM2 as a Portrait photography camera
75
manual focus
good MP (24 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
can't use external flash
71
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has face detect focus
exports RAW formats
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Canon M200 as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-PM2 as a Street photography camera
82
screen tilts up and down
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
provides touch to focus
above average high ISO (25,600)
does not have image stabilization
79
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
supports touch focus
good high ISO (25,600)
screen is fixed
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Canon M200 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-PM2 as a Sports photography camera
75
good MP (24MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports tracking autofocus
comes with phase detect AF
does not have image stabilization
66
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Canon M200 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-PM2 as a Travel photography camera
89
connects via bluetooth
provides touch to focus
good MP (24 megapixels)
has built in flash
screen is selfie friendly
66
supports touch focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
no Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Canon M200 Landscape photography details
Olympus E-PM2 Landscape photography details
80
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Canon EF-M mount)
screen size is good (3")
good MP (24MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
above average high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
does not have image stabilization
74
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
no Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Canon M200 Vlogging information
Olympus E-PM2 Vlogging information
75
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen enabled
supports face detection focusing
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
does not have image stabilization
no external microphone socket
36
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen is not selfie friendly
no mic jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon M200 and Olympus E-PM2
 Canon EOS M200Olympus PEN E-PM2
General Information
Company Canon Olympus
Model type Canon EOS M200 Olympus PEN E-PM2
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2019-09-25 2013-05-21
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor DIGIC 8 -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 22.3 x 14.9mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 332.3mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Full resolution 6000 x 4000 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 25600 25600
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 143 35
Lens
Lens support Canon EF-M Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 23 107
Focal length multiplier 1.6 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 1,040k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 6.1 frames/s 8.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.00 m (at ISO 100) 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1)
Flash modes - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/250 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 299 gr (0.66 lb) 269 gr (0.59 lb)
Physical dimensions 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 72
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.7
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.2
DXO Low light rating not tested 932
Other
Battery life 315 pictures 360 pictures
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LP-E12 BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $549 $448