Canon M200 vs Olympus PEN-F
88 Imaging
68 Features
80 Overall
72


84 Imaging
58 Features
79 Overall
66
Canon M200 vs Olympus PEN-F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Introduced September 2019
- Succeeded the Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 427g - 125 x 72 x 37mm
- Revealed January 2016

Canon M200 vs Olympus PEN-F Overview
Below is a detailed review of the Canon M200 and Olympus PEN-F, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the M200 (24MP) and the PEN-F (20MP) is pretty close but the M200 (APS-C) and PEN-F (Four Thirds) offer different sensor size.

The M200 was brought out 3 years later than the PEN-F and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the M200 scores against the PEN-F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Canon M200 vs Olympus PEN-F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Canon EOS M200 & Olympus PEN-F. The entire galleries are available at Canon M200 Gallery & Olympus PEN-F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Olympus PEN-F
M200 | PEN-F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2019 | ![]() | January 2016 | More recent by 45 months |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 1037k | Clearer screen (+3k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus PEN-F over the Canon M200
PEN-F | M200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Common features in the Canon M200 and Olympus PEN-F
M200 | PEN-F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both good for selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Canon M200 vs Olympus PEN-F Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon M200 comes with exterior dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") along with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Olympus PEN-F has measurements of 125mm x 72mm x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") along with a weight of 427 grams (0.94 lbs).
Compare the Canon M200 and Olympus PEN-F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the M200 versus the PEN-F.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the M200 and PEN-F is 88 and 84 respectively.

Canon M200 vs Olympus PEN-F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to picture the contrast in sensor measurements simply by looking through specifications. The visual below may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the M200 and PEN-F.
Plainly, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M200 due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Canon M200 will provide you with greater detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The fresher M200 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Canon M200 vs Olympus PEN-F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon M200 vs Olympus PEN-F Specifications
Canon EOS M200 | Olympus PEN-F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon EOS M200 | Olympus PEN-F |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2019-09-25 | 2016-01-27 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | DIGIC 8 | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Canon EF-M | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 23 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.6 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.1fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | - | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain) |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 299 gr (0.66 pounds) | 427 gr (0.94 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 125 x 72 x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 894 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 pictures | 330 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LP-E12 | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $549 | $1,000 |