Canon M200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
88 Imaging
69 Features
80 Overall
73


85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Canon M200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Revealed September 2019
- Previous Model is Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Launched March 2010

Canon M200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Following is a thorough overview of the Canon M200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Canon and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor sizing.

The M200 was announced 9 years after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the M200 matches up against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Canon M200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon EOS M200 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The whole galleries are available at Canon M200 Gallery and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
M200 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2019 | ![]() | March 2010 | More modern by 116 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper display (+120k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Canon M200
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | M200 |
---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
M200 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Canon M200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon M200 provides outside dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Compare the Canon M200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the M200 compared to the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M200 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 88 and 85 respectively.

Canon M200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizes just by reading through specs. The image here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the M200 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
All in all, each of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M200 having a larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Canon M200 will give more detail with its extra 14MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images more aggressively. The younger M200 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Canon M200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon M200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Canon EOS M200 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Ricoh |
Model | Canon EOS M200 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2019-09-25 | 2010-03-18 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | DIGIC 8 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Canon EF-M | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 23 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 180s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.1 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.50 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 299 gr (0.66 lbs) | 355 gr (0.78 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 images | 410 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LP-E12 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $549 | $349 |