Clicky

Canon M200 vs Ricoh PX

Portability
88
Imaging
70
Features
80
Overall
74
Canon EOS M200 front
 
Ricoh PX front
Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Canon M200 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs

Canon M200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Canon EF-M Mount
  • 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
  • Introduced September 2019
  • Succeeded the Canon M100
Ricoh PX
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
  • 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
  • Revealed August 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon M200 vs Ricoh PX Overview

On this page, we will be reviewing the Canon M200 and Ricoh PX, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and PX (16MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and PX (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The M200 was revealed 8 years later than the PX and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Canon M200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera.

Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the M200 matches up versus the PX in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Ricoh PX

 M200 PX 
RevealedSeptember 2019August 2011More recent by 99 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1040k230kCrisper screen (+810k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Canon M200

 PX M200 

Common features in the Canon M200 and Ricoh PX

 M200 PX 
Focus manually Very exact focus

Canon M200 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison

If you are going to lug around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon M200 has got external dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") along with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Ricoh PX has sizing of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).

Contrast the Canon M200 and Ricoh PX in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the M200 against the PX.

Canon M200 vs Ricoh PX size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M200 and PX is 88 and 95 respectively.

Canon M200 vs Ricoh PX top view buttons comparison

Canon M200 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements purely by going through technical specs. The photograph below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the M200 and PX.

As you can tell, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The M200 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Canon M200 will produce extra detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more recent M200 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Canon M200 vs Ricoh PX sensor size comparison

Canon M200 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder

Canon M200 vs Ricoh PX Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon M200 Portrait photography information
Ricoh PX Portrait photography information
75
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (24 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
features face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
can't use external flash
43
focusing manually
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
includes face detection focus
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Canon M200 Street photography factors
Ricoh PX Street photography factors
82
has a tilting screen
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
comes with touch focus
great high ISO (25,600)
no image stabilization
63
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Canon M200 Sports photography information
Ricoh PX Sports photography information
75
megapixel count decent (24 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
features tracking autofocus
comes with phase detect autofocus
no image stabilization
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
weather proof
slow frames per second (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Canon M200 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh PX as a Travel photography camera
89
connects via bluetooth
comes with touch focus
megapixel count decent (24 megapixels)
built-in flash
screen is selfie friendly
68
weather proof
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Canon M200 Landscape photography details
Ricoh PX Landscape photography details
80
focusing manually
swap lenses (Canon EF-M mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
megapixel count decent (24MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
great high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
no image stabilization
47
focusing manually
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
weather proof
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
missing Time Lapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Canon M200 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh PX as a Vlogging camera
75
screen is selfie friendly
screen is touchscreen
features face detection autofocus
good video quality (3840 x 2160 resolution)
no image stabilization
lack of external microphone support
31
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focus
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon M200 vs Ricoh PX Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon M200 and Ricoh PX
 Canon EOS M200Ricoh PX
General Information
Company Canon Ricoh
Model type Canon EOS M200 Ricoh PX
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2019-09-25 2011-08-16
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip DIGIC 8 Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 22.3 x 14.9mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 332.3mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 6000 x 4000 4608 x 3072
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 143 -
Lens
Lens support Canon EF-M fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.9-5.4
Macro focusing distance - 3cm
Amount of lenses 23 -
Crop factor 1.6 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 1,040 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30s 8s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 6.1 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.50 m
Flash options - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 299 grams (0.66 lb) 156 grams (0.34 lb)
Physical dimensions 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 315 photos -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID LP-E12 DB-100
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Price at release $549 $329