Canon M200 vs Ricoh PX
88 Imaging
70 Features
80 Overall
74
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Canon M200 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Introduced September 2019
- Succeeded the Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2011
Canon M200 vs Ricoh PX Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Canon M200 and Ricoh PX, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and PX (16MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and PX (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe M200 was revealed 8 years later than the PX and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Canon M200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the M200 matches up versus the PX in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Canon M200 vs Ricoh PX Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon EOS M200 and Ricoh PX. The full galleries are provided at Canon M200 Gallery and Ricoh PX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Ricoh PX
M200 | PX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2019 | August 2011 | More recent by 99 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Canon M200
PX | M200 |
---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Ricoh PX
M200 | PX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focus |
Canon M200 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon M200 has got external dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") along with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Ricoh PX has sizing of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Canon M200 and Ricoh PX in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the M200 against the PX.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M200 and PX is 88 and 95 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements purely by going through technical specs. The photograph below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the M200 and PX.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The M200 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Canon M200 will produce extra detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more recent M200 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon M200 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon M200 vs Ricoh PX Specifications
Canon EOS M200 | Ricoh PX | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Ricoh |
Model type | Canon EOS M200 | Ricoh PX |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2019-09-25 | 2011-08-16 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | DIGIC 8 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3072 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 143 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Canon EF-M | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.9-5.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 23 | - |
Crop factor | 1.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.1 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.50 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 299 grams (0.66 lb) | 156 grams (0.34 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LP-E12 | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $549 | $329 |