Canon M200 vs Samsung NX300M
88 Imaging
69 Features
80 Overall
73
86 Imaging
62 Features
73 Overall
66
Canon M200 vs Samsung NX300M Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Launched September 2019
- Previous Model is Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Introduced January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon M200 vs Samsung NX300M Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Canon M200 vs Samsung NX300M, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by companies Canon and Samsung. The resolution of the M200 (24MP) and the NX300M (20MP) is fairly similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (APS-C).
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe M200 was manufactured 6 years after the NX300M which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a quick overview of how the M200 matches up vs the NX300M in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon M200 vs Samsung NX300M Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon EOS M200 & Samsung NX300M. The entire galleries are available at Canon M200 Gallery & Samsung NX300M Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Samsung NX300M
| M200 | NX300M | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2019 |  | January 2013 | Newer by 82 months |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 768k | Sharper display (+272k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300M over the Canon M200
| NX300M | M200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3.3" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Canon M200 and Samsung NX300M
| M200 | NX300M | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Tilting | Tilting display |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Canon M200 vs Samsung NX300M Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon M200 features physical measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) while the Samsung NX300M has measurements of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") with a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Analyze the Canon M200 vs Samsung NX300M in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the M200 vs the NX300M.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the M200 and NX300M is 88 and 86 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Samsung NX300M Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading a spec sheet. The pic below will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the M200 and NX300M.
As you can see, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Canon M200 to offer more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The more recent M200 will have an edge in sensor technology.
Canon M200 vs Samsung NX300M Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon M200 vs Samsung NX300M Specifications
| Canon EOS M200 | Samsung NX300M | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon EOS M200 | Samsung NX300M |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2019-09-25 | 2013-01-03 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 8 | DRIMe IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | 247 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Canon EF-M | Samsung NX |
| Total lenses | 23 | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3.3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 768 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/6000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 6.1 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 299 gr (0.66 lbs) | 331 gr (0.73 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 315 shots | 330 shots |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LP-E12 | BP1130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $549 | $699 |