Canon M200 vs Sony NEX-F3
88 Imaging
69 Features
80 Overall
73
86 Imaging
57 Features
60 Overall
58
Canon M200 vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Introduced September 2019
- Succeeded the Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
- Introduced August 2012
- Succeeded the Sony NEX-C3
- Replacement is Sony NEX-3N
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon M200 vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview
Here is a extended comparison of the Canon M200 vs Sony NEX-F3, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by competitors Canon and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and NEX-F3 (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (APS-C).
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe M200 was announced 7 years later than the NEX-F3 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the M200 matches up vs the NEX-F3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon M200 vs Sony NEX-F3 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon EOS M200 and Sony Alpha NEX-F3. The whole galleries are provided at Canon M200 Gallery and Sony NEX-F3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Sony NEX-F3
| M200 | NEX-F3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2019 |  | August 2012 | Fresher by 87 months |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 920k | Sharper screen (+120k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Canon M200
| NEX-F3 | M200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Sony NEX-F3
| M200 | NEX-F3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Tilting | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Canon M200 vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon M200 comes with outside dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-F3 has proportions of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).
Examine the Canon M200 vs Sony NEX-F3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the M200 vs the NEX-F3.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M200 and NEX-F3 is 88 and 86 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizing just by looking through a spec sheet. The visual here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M200 and NEX-F3.
Clearly, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Canon M200 to provide you with more detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more modern M200 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Canon M200 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon M200 vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications
| Canon EOS M200 | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Sony |
| Model | Canon EOS M200 | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2019-09-25 | 2012-08-16 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 8 | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 16000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Canon EF-M | Sony E |
| Amount of lenses | 23 | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 6.1 frames per second | 6.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 299g (0.66 lb) | 314g (0.69 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 73 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1114 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 315 photos | 470 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LP-E12 | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $549 | $470 |