Canon M50 II vs Sony A3000
79 Imaging
70 Features
88 Overall
77
69 Imaging
63 Features
54 Overall
59
Canon M50 II vs Sony A3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Push to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 387g - 116 x 88 x 59mm
- Introduced October 2020
- Replaced the Canon M50
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Announced August 2013
- Replacement is Sony a3500
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon M50 II vs Sony A3000 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Canon M50 II and Sony A3000, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by brands Canon and Sony. The resolution of the M50 II (24MP) and the A3000 (20MP) is very comparable and they feature the same exact sensor size (APS-C).
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe M50 II was brought out 7 years later than the A3000 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the M50 II matches up vs the A3000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon M50 II vs Sony A3000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon EOS M50 Mark II and Sony Alpha A3000. The entire galleries are available at Canon M50 II Gallery and Sony A3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M50 II over the Sony A3000
| M50 II | A3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | October 2020 |  | August 2013 | Fresher by 87 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A3000 over the Canon M50 II
| A3000 | M50 II |
|---|
Common features in the Canon M50 II and Sony A3000
| M50 II | A3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Canon M50 II vs Sony A3000 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Canon M50 II has got external dimensions of 116mm x 88mm x 59mm (4.6" x 3.5" x 2.3") and a weight of 387 grams (0.85 lbs) whilst the Sony A3000 has measurements of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") with a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).
Compare the Canon M50 II and Sony A3000 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the M50 II against the A3000.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M50 II and A3000 is 79 and 69 respectively.
Canon M50 II vs Sony A3000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing only by checking out technical specs. The graphic here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the M50 II and A3000.
As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Canon M50 II to produce extra detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The more recent M50 II is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Canon M50 II vs Sony A3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon M50 II vs Sony A3000 Specifications
| Canon EOS M50 Mark II | Sony Alpha A3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Sony |
| Model | Canon EOS M50 Mark II | Sony Alpha A3000 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2020-10-14 | 2013-08-27 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | BIONZ image |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 16000 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Canon EF-M | Sony E |
| Amount of lenses | 23 | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.47x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
| Flash modes | - | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD, H.264, MP4 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Yes | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 387 gr (0.85 lb) | 411 gr (0.91 lb) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 88 x 59mm (4.6" x 3.5" x 2.3") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.8 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1068 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 305 photographs | 470 photographs |
| Type of battery | Built-in | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC slot (UHS-I compatible) | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $599 | $398 |