Canon R10 vs OM System OM-1
69 Imaging
71 Features
85 Overall
76
![Canon EOS R10 front Canon EOS R10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Canon-EOS-R10/Canon-R10-front.jpg)
![OM System OM-1 front OM System OM-1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/OM-System-OM-1/OM-System-OM-1-front.jpg)
65 Imaging
64 Features
96 Overall
76
Canon R10 vs OM System OM-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Boost to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon RF Mount
- 426g - 123 x 88 x 83mm
- Launched May 2022
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600 (Expand to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 599g - 135 x 92 x 73mm
- Released February 2022
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Canon R10 vs OM System OM-1 Overview
Here is a extended review of the Canon R10 and OM System OM-1, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by competitors Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the R10 (24MP) and the OM System OM-1 (20MP) is very well matched but the R10 (APS-C) and OM System OM-1 (Four Thirds) possess totally different sensor size.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The R10 was released 4 months later than the OM System OM-1 so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the R10 grades against the OM System OM-1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Canon R10 vs OM System OM-1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon EOS R10 & OM System OM-1. The complete galleries are provided at Canon R10 Gallery & OM System OM-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon R10 over the OM System OM-1
R10 | OM System OM-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick OM System OM-1 over the Canon R10
OM System OM-1 | R10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1620k | ![]() | 1040k | Crisper display (+580k dot) |
Common features in the Canon R10 and OM System OM-1
R10 | OM System OM-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2022 | ![]() | February 2022 | Similar age |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display |
Display sizing | 3.00" | ![]() | 3.00" | Equivalent display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both good for selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Canon R10 vs OM System OM-1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon R10 provides exterior dimensions of 123mm x 88mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 3.3") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the OM System OM-1 has sizing of 135mm x 92mm x 73mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.9") along with a weight of 599 grams (1.32 lbs).
Check the Canon R10 and OM System OM-1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the R10 compared to the OM System OM-1.
![Canon R10 vs OM System OM-1 size comparison Canon R10 vs OM System OM-1 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-EOS-R10-vs-OM-System-OM-1-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the R10 and OM System OM-1 is 69 and 65 respectively.
![Canon R10 vs OM System OM-1 top view buttons comparison Canon R10 vs OM System OM-1 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-EOS-R10-vs-OM-System-OM-1-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon R10 vs OM System OM-1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing purely by looking at specs. The photograph here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the R10 and OM System OM-1.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The R10 due to its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Canon R10 will give greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a little more aggressively.
![Canon R10 vs OM System OM-1 sensor size comparison Canon R10 vs OM System OM-1 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-EOS-R10-vs-OM-System-OM-1-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon R10 vs OM System OM-1 Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon R10 vs OM System OM-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon R10 vs OM System OM-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-EOS-R10-vs-OM-System-OM-1-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Canon R10 vs OM System OM-1 Specifications
Canon EOS R10 | OM System OM-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon EOS R10 | OM System OM-1 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2022-05-24 | 2022-02-15 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | Stacked BSI Live MOS Sensor |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 22.2 x 14.8mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 328.6mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 32000 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 651 | 1053 |
Cross type focus points | - | 1053 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Canon RF | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 35 | 118 |
Crop factor | 1.6 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3.00" | 3.00" |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,620 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 5,760 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.6x | 0.83x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 15.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6m at ISO 100 | no built-in flash |
Flash options | - | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/200s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 230 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 470 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 70 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 90 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 170 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 170 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 85 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 85 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 230 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 470 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 70 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 90 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC | - |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265, HEVC |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 426g (0.94 lb) | 599g (1.32 lb) |
Dimensions | 123 x 88 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 3.3") | 135 x 92 x 73mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 450 pictures | 520 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LP-E17 | BLX-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Single UHS-II SD card slot | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) |
Storage slots | Single | 2 |
Cost at launch | $879 | $2,199 |