Canon R3 vs Fujifilm X-H2
52 Imaging
77 Features
93 Overall
83
62 Imaging
76 Features
93 Overall
82
Canon R3 vs Fujifilm X-H2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400 (Raise to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 6000 x 3164 video
- Canon RF Mount
- 1015g - 150 x 143 x 87mm
- Introduced September 2021
(Full Review)
- 40MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 7680 x 4320 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 660g - 136 x 93 x 95mm
- Announced September 2022
- Previous Model is Fujifilm X-H1
Canon R3 vs Fujifilm X-H2 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Canon R3 versus Fujifilm X-H2, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Canon and FujiFilm. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the R3 (24MP) and Fujifilm X-H2 (40MP) and the R3 (Full frame) and Fujifilm X-H2 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe R3 was brought out 11 months before the Fujifilm X-H2 and they are of a similar generation. The two cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the R3 grades vs the Fujifilm X-H2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon R3 vs Fujifilm X-H2 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon EOS R3 and Fujifilm X-H2. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon R3 Gallery and Fujifilm X-H2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon R3 over the Fujifilm X-H2
R3 | Fujifilm X-H2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.2" | 3.00" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 4150k | 1620k | Sharper screen (+2530k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H2 over the Canon R3
Fujifilm X-H2 | R3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2022 | September 2021 | Newer by 11 months |
Common features in the Canon R3 and Fujifilm X-H2
R3 | Fujifilm X-H2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Canon R3 vs Fujifilm X-H2 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon R3 has got exterior measurements of 150mm x 143mm x 87mm (5.9" x 5.6" x 3.4") and a weight of 1015 grams (2.24 lbs) and the Fujifilm X-H2 has measurements of 136mm x 93mm x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs).
Check out the Canon R3 versus Fujifilm X-H2 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the R3 and the Fujifilm X-H2.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the R3 and Fujifilm X-H2 is 52 and 62 respectively.
Canon R3 vs Fujifilm X-H2 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions merely by going over technical specs. The picture underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the R3 and Fujifilm X-H2.
As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The R3 because of its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Fujifilm X-H2 will deliver extra detail having its extra 16MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged R3 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon R3 vs Fujifilm X-H2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon R3 vs Fujifilm X-H2 Specifications
Canon EOS R3 | Fujifilm X-H2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model | Canon EOS R3 | Fujifilm X-H2 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2021-09-14 | 2022-09-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | Stacked CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 40 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 7728 x 5152 |
Highest native ISO | 102400 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | 204800 | 51200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 50 | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 1053 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Canon RF | Fujifilm X |
Available lenses | 27 | 82 |
Crop factor | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3.2" | 3.00" |
Screen resolution | 4,150k dots | 1,620k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dots | 5,760k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.76x | 0.8x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/64000 seconds | 1/180000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 12.0 frames/s | 15.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 6000x3164 (60p/50p/30p/24p/23.98p) 4096x2160 (120p/60p/30p/24p/23.98p) 3840x2160 (120p/60p/30p/23.98p) 1920x1080 (60p/30p/23.98p) | 8192 x 4320 @ 30p |
Highest video resolution | 6000x3164 | 7680x4320 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 1015g (2.24 pounds) | 660g (1.46 pounds) |
Dimensions | 150 x 143 x 87mm (5.9" x 5.6" x 3.4") | 136 x 93 x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 96 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 25.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 4086 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 760 pictures | 680 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LP-E19 | NP-W235 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC (UHS-II supported) + CFexpress Type B | 1x CFexpress Type B, 1x UHS-II SD |
Card slots | 2 | 2 |
Launch price | $6,000 | $1,999 |