Clicky

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus XZ-1

Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
17
Overall
27
Olympus FE-4000 front
 
Olympus XZ-1 front
Portability
88
Imaging
35
Features
51
Overall
41

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs

Olympus FE-4000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
  • 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Introduced July 2009
  • Alternate Name is X-925
Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Launched January 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview

Its time to look much closer at the Olympus FE-4000 versus Olympus XZ-1, both Small Sensor Compact cameras and both are built by Olympus. The resolution of the FE-4000 (12MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is very comparable but the FE-4000 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") possess totally different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The FE-4000 was announced 18 months prior to the XZ-1 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the FE-4000 scores vs the XZ-1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Olympus XZ-1

 FE-4000 XZ-1 

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus FE-4000

 XZ-1 FE-4000 
LaunchedJanuary 2011July 2009More recent by 18 months
Manual focus Very accurate focus
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution614k230kCrisper display (+384k dot)

Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus XZ-1

 FE-4000 XZ-1 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither includes Touch friendly display

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-4000 features external dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-1 has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus FE-4000 versus Olympus XZ-1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the FE-4000 against the XZ-1.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-4000 and XZ-1 is 95 and 88 respectively.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements purely by going through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4000 and XZ-1.

Clearly, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The FE-4000 using its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus FE-4000 will produce greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The older FE-4000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus FE-4000
Portrait photography with Olympus XZ-1
21
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
45
you can focus manually
features face detect focusing
exports RAW files
low resolution (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.63")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Street photography advice
Olympus XZ-1 Street photography advice
55
lighter than others (136g)
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/1.63")
more heavy than others in class (275 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus XZ-1 as a Sports photography camera
17
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features tracking focus
great battery power (320 shots)
continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames/s)
low resolution (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.63")
lack of phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Travel photography advice
Olympus XZ-1 Travel photography advice
62
lighter than others (136 grams)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
62
great battery power (320 per charge)
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
does not have Timelapse mode
more heavy than others in class (275 grams)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Landscape photography details
Olympus XZ-1 Landscape photography details
28
reasonably wide (26mm)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
54
you can focus manually
decently wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
great battery power (320 CIPA)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.63")
does not have Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Vlogging advice
Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging advice
28
reasonably wide (26mm)
lighter than others (136g)
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external mic support
31
decently wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focusing
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have microphone jack
more heavy than others in class (275 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus XZ-1
 Olympus FE-4000Olympus XZ-1
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus FE-4000 Olympus XZ-1
Also Known as X-925 -
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2009-07-22 2011-01-26
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III TruePic V
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.63"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 8.07 x 5.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 44.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3968 x 2976 3664 x 2752
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points - 11
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-105mm (4.0x) 28-112mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.6-5.9 f/1.8-2.5
Macro focus distance 3cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 614 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech - OLED
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.00 m 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 136 grams (0.30 lb) 275 grams (0.61 lb)
Dimensions 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 34
DXO Color Depth score not tested 18.8
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.4
DXO Low light score not tested 117
Other
Battery life - 320 shots
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model - Li-50B
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $130 $567