Clicky

Canon R5 C vs Fujifilm X-T200

Portability
57 Imaging
81 Features
89 Overall
84
Canon EOS R5 C front
 
Fujifilm X-T200 front
Portability
80 Imaging
70 Features
87 Overall
76

Canon R5 C vs Fujifilm X-T200 Key Specs

Canon R5 C
(Full Review)
  • 45MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3.20" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 51200 (Raise to 102400)
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 8192 x 4320 video
  • Canon RF Mount
  • 770g - 142 x 101 x 111mm
  • Released January 2022
Fujifilm X-T200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.5" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 12800 (Expand to 51200)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
  • Announced January 2020
  • Older Model is Fujifilm X-T100
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon R5 C vs Fujifilm X-T200 Overview

Here is a detailed assessment of the Canon R5 C vs Fujifilm X-T200, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Canon and FujiFilm. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the R5 C (45MP) and Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and the R5 C (Full frame) and Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) have different sensor sizing.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The R5 C was unveiled 2 years later than the Fujifilm X-T200 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).

Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the R5 C matches up versus the Fujifilm X-T200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Canon R5 C over the Fujifilm X-T200

		

		

			
 R5 C Fujifilm X-T200 
AnnouncedJanuary 2022January 2020Fresher by 25 months
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Canon R5 C

		

		

			
 Fujifilm X-T200 R5 C 
Screen size3.5"3.20"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution2780k2100kSharper screen (+680k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Canon R5 C and Fujifilm X-T200

		

		

			
 R5 C Fujifilm X-T200 
Manually focus  Very accurate focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFully ArticulatedFully Articulated screen
Selfie screen  Both are selfie friendly
Touch screen  Quickly navigate
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Canon R5 C vs Fujifilm X-T200 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
For those who are planning to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon R5 C has got outer dimensions of 142mm x 101mm x 111mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 4.4") along with a weight of 770 grams (1.70 lbs) and the Fujifilm X-T200 has proportions of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") along with a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).
Examine the Canon R5 C vs Fujifilm X-T200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the R5 C versus the Fujifilm X-T200.
Canon R5 C vs Fujifilm X-T200 size comparison
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the R5 C and Fujifilm X-T200 is 57 and 80 respectively.
Canon R5 C vs Fujifilm X-T200 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Canon R5 C vs Fujifilm X-T200 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Normally, it's tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing simply by looking at technical specs. The graphic here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the R5 C and Fujifilm X-T200.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The R5 C with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Canon R5 C will give more detail having an extra 21 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more modern R5 C provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
	
			Canon R5 C vs Fujifilm X-T200 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Canon R5 C vs Fujifilm X-T200 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Canon R5 C vs Fujifilm X-T200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
 Canon R5 C as a Portrait photography camera
 Fujifilm X-T200 as a Portrait photography camera
88
 you can focus manually
 amazing megapixels (45 megapixels)
 large sensor size (Full frame)
 features face detection focusing
 supports RAW files
82
 focusing manually
 decent megapixels (24 megapixels)
 good sensor size (APS-C)
 comes with face detection autofocus
 supports RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Street Comparison
Canon R5 C Street photography factors
Fujifilm X-T200 Street photography factors
72
 screen can move to multiple angles
 large sensor size (Full frame)
 supports RAW files
 includes focus via touch
 environment proof
 above average high ISO (51,200)
 does not have image stabilization
78
 fully articulated screen
 good sensor size (APS-C)
 supports RAW files
 offers focus by touch
 lack of image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Sports Comparison
Canon R5 C Sports photography info
Fujifilm X-T200 Sports photography info
79
 high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
 silent shooting (1/8,000s)
 amazing megapixels (45 megapixels)
 large sensor size (Full frame)
 features tracking autofocus
 environment proof
 has phase detect AF
 does not have image stabilization
 bad battery pack (320 per charge)
70
 silent shutter (1/32,000s)
 decent megapixels (24MP)
 good sensor size (APS-C)
 comes with tracking autofocus
 sensor has phase detect autofocus
 lack of image stabilization
 not so great battery pack (270 shots)
Photography Glossary
Travel Comparison
Canon R5 C Travel photography information
Fujifilm X-T200 Travel photography information
72
 environment proof
 has bluetooth
 includes focus via touch
 amazing megapixels (45 megapixels)
 screen is selfie friendly
 bad battery pack (320 CIPA)
79
 connects via bluetooth
 offers focus by touch
 decent megapixels (24 megapixels)
 built-in flash
 selfie friendly display
 not so great battery pack (270 CIPA)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Landscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Canon R5 C
Landscape photography with Fujifilm X-T200
79
 you can focus manually
 swap lenses (Canon RF mount)
 screen is a decent size (3.20")
 amazing megapixels (45 megapixels)
 large sensor size (Full frame)
 above average high ISO (51,200)
 supports RAW files
 environment proof
 two card slots
 does not have image stabilization
 bad battery pack (320 shots)
73
 focusing manually
 change lenses (Fujifilm X mount)
 screen larger than average (3.5 inches)
 decent megapixels (24 megapixels)
 good sensor size (APS-C)
 supports RAW files
 lack of image stabilization
 not so great battery pack (270 CIPA)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Vlogging Comparison
Canon R5 C Vlogging details
Fujifilm X-T200 Vlogging details
72
 screen is selfie friendly
 screen is touchscreen
 features face detection focusing
 video res high (8192 x 4320 resolution)
 has external microphone socket
 does not have image stabilization
79
 selfie friendly display
 screen is touchscreen
 comes with face detection autofocus
 video res high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
 includes external microphone socket
 lack of image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	

		

			
Canon R5 C vs Fujifilm X-T200 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Canon R5 C and Fujifilm X-T200
 Canon EOS R5 CFujifilm X-T200
General Information
Brand Name Canon FujiFilm
Model Canon EOS R5 C Fujifilm X-T200
Type Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2022-01-19 2020-01-22
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame APS-C
Sensor measurements 36 x 24mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 864.0mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 45 megapixels 24 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Highest Possible resolution 8192 x 5464 6000 x 4000
Maximum native ISO 51200 12800
Maximum enhanced ISO 102400 51200
Minimum native ISO 100 200
RAW format    
Minimum enhanced ISO 50 100
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch focus    
AF continuous    
AF single    
Tracking AF    
AF selectice    
Center weighted AF    
Multi area AF    
Live view AF    
Face detection focusing    
Contract detection focusing    
Phase detection focusing    
Number of focus points 1053 425
Lens
Lens mounting type Canon RF Fujifilm X
Number of lenses 30 54
Crop factor 1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fully Articulated
Screen size 3.20 inches 3.5 inches
Resolution of screen 2,100 thousand dots 2,780 thousand dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch capability    
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 5,760 thousand dots 2,360 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.76x 0.62x
Features
Min shutter speed 30 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/4000 secs
Max silent shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/32000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 12.0fps 8.0fps
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash range no built-in flash 7.00 m (at ISO 200)
Flash modes no built-in flash -
External flash    
AE bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 8192 x 4320 @ 30p / 540 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM8192 x 4320 @ 24p / 540 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM8192 x 4320 @ 23.98p / 540 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM8192 x 4320 @ 30p / 400 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM8192 x 4320 @ 24p / 400 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM8192 x 4320 @ 23.98p / 400 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM7680 x 4320 @ 30p / 540 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM7680 x 4320 @ 24p / 540 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM7680 x 4320 @ 23.98p / 540 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM7680 x 4320 @ 30p / 400 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM7680 x 4320 @ 24p / 400 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM7680 x 4320 @ 23.98p / 400 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 60p / 810 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 60p / 260 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 410 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 410 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 410 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 160 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 160 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 160 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 810 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 260 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 410 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 410 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 410 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 160 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 160 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 160 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 60p / 225 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 60p / 170 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 60p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 135 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 135 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 135 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 225 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 170 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 135 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 135 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 135 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution 8192x4320 3840x2160
Video file format MPEG-4, XF-AVC, H.264, H.265 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port    
Headphone port    
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 770g (1.70 pounds) 370g (0.82 pounds)
Physical dimensions 142 x 101 x 111mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 4.4") 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 320 photos 270 photos
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LP-E6NH NP-W126S
Self timer Yes Yes
Time lapse shooting    
Storage type CFexpress B and SD (UHS-II) slots SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported)
Card slots Dual 1
Pricing at release $4,499 $699