Clicky

Canon R5 C vs Olympus E-M10 II

Portability
57 Imaging
82 Features
89 Overall
84
Canon EOS R5 C front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
Portability
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63

Canon R5 C vs Olympus E-M10 II Key Specs

Canon R5 C
(Full Review)
  • 45MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3.20" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 51200 (Bump to 102400)
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 8192 x 4320 video
  • Canon RF Mount
  • 770g - 142 x 101 x 111mm
  • Launched January 2022
Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Released August 2015
  • Old Model is Olympus E-M10
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Canon R5 C vs Olympus E-M10 II Overview

Following is a in depth overview of the Canon R5 C and Olympus E-M10 II, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the R5 C (45MP) and E-M10 II (16MP) and the R5 C (Full frame) and E-M10 II (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The R5 C was revealed 6 years after the E-M10 II which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).

Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the R5 C scores versus the E-M10 II when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Canon R5 C over the Olympus E-M10 II

		

		

			
 R5 C E-M10 II 
ReleasedJanuary 2022August 2015More modern by 78 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating display
Display dimensions3.20"3"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution2100k1040kSharper display (+1060k dot)
Selfie screen  Take selfies
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Canon R5 C

		

		

			
 E-M10 II R5 C 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Canon R5 C and Olympus E-M10 II

		

		

			
 R5 C E-M10 II 
Focus manually  Very accurate focus
Touch display  Easily navigate
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Canon R5 C vs Olympus E-M10 II Physical Comparison

		

		

			
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Canon R5 C has outer dimensions of 142mm x 101mm x 111mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 4.4") along with a weight of 770 grams (1.70 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M10 II has sizing of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).
Analyze the Canon R5 C and Olympus E-M10 II in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the R5 C compared to the E-M10 II.
Canon R5 C vs Olympus E-M10 II size comparison
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the R5 C and E-M10 II is 57 and 82 respectively.
Canon R5 C vs Olympus E-M10 II top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Canon R5 C vs Olympus E-M10 II Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
More often than not, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading technical specs. The picture below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the R5 C and E-M10 II.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The R5 C using its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Canon R5 C will offer you extra detail because of its extra 29 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The newer R5 C will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
	
			Canon R5 C vs Olympus E-M10 II sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Canon R5 C vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Canon R5 C vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Canon R5 C Portrait photography highlights
Olympus E-M10 II Portrait photography highlights
89
 has manual focus
 resolution is fantastic (45MP)
 great sensor size (Full frame)
 has face detect focus
 delivers RAW formats
72
 manual focus
 megapixel count decent (16MP)
 sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
 features face detect focus
 saves RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Street Comparison
Canon R5 C Street photography info
Olympus E-M10 II Street photography info
72
 screen articulates fully
 great sensor size (Full frame)
 delivers RAW formats
 includes focus by touch
 environment proof
 good high ISO (51,200)
 does not have image stabilization
83
 screen tilts
 image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
 sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
 saves RAW files
 boasts focus via touch
 above average ISO range (25,600)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Sports Comparison
Canon R5 C Sports photography highlights
Olympus E-M10 II Sports photography highlights
79
 maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
 quiet shutter (1/8,000 seconds)
 resolution is fantastic (45 megapixels)
 great sensor size (Full frame)
 has tracking focus
 environment proof
 has phase detect auto focus
 does not have image stabilization
 bad battery life (320 CIPA)
67
 image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
 megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
 sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
 features tracking focus
 does not have phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Travel Comparison
 Canon R5 C as a Travel photography camera
 Olympus E-M10 II as a Travel photography camera
72
 environment proof
 has bluetooth
 includes focus by touch
 resolution is fantastic (45 megapixels)
 selfie friendly screen
 bad battery life (320 shots)
73
 boasts focus via touch
 megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
 has built in flash
 doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Landscape Comparison
Canon R5 C Landscape photography details
Olympus E-M10 II Landscape photography details
79
 has manual focus
 switch lenses (Canon RF mount)
 screen size is good (3.20")
 resolution is fantastic (45 megapixels)
 great sensor size (Full frame)
 good high ISO (51,200)
 delivers RAW formats
 environment proof
 has dual storage slots
 does not have image stabilization
 bad battery life (320 shots)
79
 manual focus
 change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
 screen size is decent (3 inch)
 image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
 megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
 sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
 above average ISO range (25,600)
 saves RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Vlogging Comparison
Canon R5 C Vlogging factors
Olympus E-M10 II Vlogging factors
72
 selfie friendly screen
 touchscreen functionality
 has face detect focus
 high quality video (8192 x 4320 pxls)
 has microphone jack
 does not have image stabilization
35
 built-in touchscreen
 image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
 features face detect focus
 high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
 lack of microphone socket
Photography Glossary
	

		

			
Canon R5 C vs Olympus E-M10 II Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Canon R5 C and Olympus E-M10 II
 Canon EOS R5 COlympus OM-D E-M10 II
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Olympus
Model Canon EOS R5 C Olympus OM-D E-M10 II
Class Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2022-01-19 2015-08-25
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 36 x 24mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 864.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 45 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Full resolution 8192 x 5464 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 51200 25600
Max boosted ISO 102400 -
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW photos    
Min boosted ISO 50 100
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Autofocus touch    
Continuous autofocus    
Autofocus single    
Autofocus tracking    
Autofocus selectice    
Center weighted autofocus    
Autofocus multi area    
Live view autofocus    
Face detection focus    
Contract detection focus    
Phase detection focus    
Number of focus points 1053 81
Lens
Lens mounting type Canon RF Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 30 107
Focal length multiplier 1 2.1
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Tilting
Screen size 3.20 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 2,100k dots 1,040k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch functionality    
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 5,760k dots 2,360k dots
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.76x 0.62x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 secs 60 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/4000 secs
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/8000 secs -
Continuous shooting rate 12.0 frames per sec 8.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance    
Image stabilization    
Built-in flash    
Flash range no built-in flash 5.80 m (ISO 100)
Flash settings no built-in flash Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual
Hot shoe    
AEB    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 8192 x 4320 @ 30p / 540 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM8192 x 4320 @ 24p / 540 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM8192 x 4320 @ 23.98p / 540 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM8192 x 4320 @ 30p / 400 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM8192 x 4320 @ 24p / 400 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM8192 x 4320 @ 23.98p / 400 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM7680 x 4320 @ 30p / 540 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM7680 x 4320 @ 24p / 540 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM7680 x 4320 @ 23.98p / 540 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM7680 x 4320 @ 30p / 400 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM7680 x 4320 @ 24p / 400 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM7680 x 4320 @ 23.98p / 400 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 60p / 810 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 60p / 260 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 410 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 410 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 410 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 160 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 160 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 160 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 810 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 260 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 410 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 410 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 410 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 160 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 160 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 160 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 60p / 225 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 60p / 170 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 60p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 135 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 135 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 135 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 225 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 170 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 135 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 135 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 135 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 8192x4320 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, XF-AVC, H.264, H.265 H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone port    
Headphone port    
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 770 grams (1.70 lb) 390 grams (0.86 lb)
Physical dimensions 142 x 101 x 111mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 4.4") 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 73
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.1
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.5
DXO Low light score not tested 842
Other
Battery life 320 photographs 320 photographs
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LP-E6NH BLS-50
Self timer Yes Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom)
Time lapse shooting    
Storage type CFexpress B and SD (UHS-II) slots SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 2 One
Launch cost $4,499 $499