Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C
59 Imaging
80 Features
90 Overall
84


60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 45MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Push to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 8192 x 4320 video
- Canon RF Mount
- 738g - 138 x 98 x 88mm
- Announced July 2020
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Announced June 2019
- Succeeded the Hasselblad X1D
- Renewed by Hasselblad X2D

Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by competitors Canon and Hasselblad. The image resolution of the R5 (45MP) and the X1D II 50C (51MP) is relatively comparable but the R5 (Full frame) and X1D II 50C (Medium format) boast different sensor sizes.

The R5 was manufactured 13 months after the X1D II 50C which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Canon R5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the R5 scores versus the X1D II 50C for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon EOS R5 & Hasselblad X1D II 50C. The entire galleries are provided at Canon R5 Gallery & Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon R5 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
R5 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2020 | ![]() | June 2019 | Newer by 13 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Canon R5
X1D II 50C | R5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.60" | ![]() | 3.2" | Bigger screen (+0.4") |
Screen resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 2100k | Crisper screen (+260k dot) |
Common features in the Canon R5 and Hasselblad X1D II 50C
R5 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon R5 offers physical dimensions of 138mm x 98mm x 88mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 3.5") having a weight of 738 grams (1.63 lbs) and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C has measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs).
Check the Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the R5 against the X1D II 50C.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the R5 and X1D II 50C is 59 and 60 respectively.

Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions only by going through specs. The pic here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the R5 and X1D II 50C.
As you can plainly see, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The R5 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF harder and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will show greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots more aggressively. The younger R5 provides a benefit in sensor tech.

Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Specifications
Canon EOS R5 | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Hasselblad |
Model | Canon EOS R5 | Hasselblad X1D II 50C |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2020-07-09 | 2019-06-19 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic X | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Medium format |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 45 megapixel | 51 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 4:3 |
Full resolution | 8192 x 5464 | 8272 x 6200 |
Max native ISO | 51200 | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | 102400 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 50 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 1053 | 117 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Canon RF | Hasselblad X |
Amount of lenses | 17 | 13 |
Crop factor | 1 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.2" | 3.60" |
Screen resolution | 2,100k dots | 2,360k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dots | 3,690k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.76x | 0.87x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/10000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 12.0 frames per sec | 2.7 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 8192x4320 (30p/24/23.98p) 7680x4320 (30p/23.98p) |4096x2160 (120p/60p/30p/24p/23.98p) |3840x2160 (120p/60p/30p/23.98p) |1920x1080 (60p/30p/23.98p) | 2720 x 1530 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 8192x4320 | 2720x1530 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 738g (1.63 pounds) | 725g (1.60 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 138 x 98 x 88mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 3.5") | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 102 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 26.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 4489 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LP-E6NH | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | CFexpress and SD (UHS-II) slots | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Card slots | Two | Two |
Price at launch | $3,899 | $5,750 |