Clicky

Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-T200

Portability
75 Imaging
72 Features
88 Overall
78
Canon EOS R50 front
 
Fujifilm X-T200 front
Portability
80 Imaging
70 Features
87 Overall
76

Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Key Specs

Canon R50
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 32000 (Bump to 51200)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Canon RF Mount
  • 375g - 116 x 86 x 69mm
  • Launched February 2023
Fujifilm X-T200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.5" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 12800 (Boost to 51200)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
  • Announced January 2020
  • Succeeded the Fujifilm X-T100
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Overview

Below is a in-depth comparison of the Canon R50 versus Fujifilm X-T200, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by brands Canon and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the R50 (24MP) and the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (APS-C).

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The R50 was released 3 years later than the Fujifilm X-T200 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).

Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the R50 grades vs the Fujifilm X-T200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Canon R50 over the Fujifilm X-T200

		

		

			
 R50 Fujifilm X-T200 
AnnouncedFebruary 2023January 2020More recent by 38 months
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Canon R50

		

		

			
 Fujifilm X-T200 R50 
Display size3.5"3.00"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution2780k1040kCrisper display (+1740k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Canon R50 and Fujifilm X-T200

		

		

			
 R50 Fujifilm X-T200 
Focus manually  Very accurate focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFully ArticulatedFully Articulated display
Selfie screen  Both good for selfies
Touch friendly display  Easily navigate
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
In case you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon R50 has outside dimensions of 116mm x 86mm x 69mm (4.6" x 3.4" x 2.7") having a weight of 375 grams (0.83 lbs) while the Fujifilm X-T200 has measurements of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") along with a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).
Look at the Canon R50 versus Fujifilm X-T200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the R50 against the Fujifilm X-T200.
Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-T200 size comparison
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the R50 and Fujifilm X-T200 is 75 and 80 respectively.
Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-T200 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Normally, its hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements just by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph below should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the R50 and Fujifilm X-T200.
Clearly, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same MP so you can expect comparable quality of photographs though you really should take the launch date  of the cameras into account. The newer R50 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
	
			Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-T200 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Canon R50
Portrait photography with Fujifilm X-T200
83
 focusing manually
 MP count good (24MP)
 nice sensor size (APS-C)
 has face detection focus
 saves RAW formats
82
 focusing manually
 megapixel count decent (24 megapixels)
 nice sensor size (APS-C)
 comes with face detection focus
 saves RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Street Comparison
Street photography with Canon R50
Street photography with Fujifilm X-T200
77
 screen articulates
 nice sensor size (APS-C)
 saves RAW formats
 includes focus by touch
 very good high ISO (32,000)
 no image stabilization
78
 screen articulates fully
 nice sensor size (APS-C)
 saves RAW files
 features touch to focus
 lack of image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sports Comparison
Canon R50 Sports photography highlights
Fujifilm X-T200 Sports photography highlights
77
 quiet mode (1/8,000s)
 MP count good (24MP)
 nice sensor size (APS-C)
 has tracking autofocus
 has phase detect auto focus
 no image stabilization
70
 silent shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
 megapixel count decent (24MP)
 nice sensor size (APS-C)
 comes with tracking autofocus
 supports phase detect auto focus
 lack of image stabilization
 low battery (270 per charge)
Photography Glossary
Travel Comparison
Canon R50 Travel photography information
Fujifilm X-T200 Travel photography information
84
 has bluetooth
 includes focus by touch
 MP count good (24MP)
 built-in flash
 selfie friendly display
79
 connects via bluetooth
 features touch to focus
 megapixel count decent (24 megapixels)
 built-in flash
 screen is selfie friendly
 low battery (270 per charge)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Landscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Canon R50
Landscape photography with Fujifilm X-T200
80
 focusing manually
 interchangeable lenses (Canon RF mount)
 screen is a good size (3.00 inches)
 MP count good (24MP)
 nice sensor size (APS-C)
 very good high ISO (32,000)
 saves RAW formats
 no image stabilization
73
 focusing manually
 swap lenses (Fujifilm X mount)
 screen larger than average (3.5 inches)
 megapixel count decent (24 megapixels)
 nice sensor size (APS-C)
 saves RAW files
 lack of image stabilization
 low battery (270 CIPA)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Vlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Canon R50
Vlogging with Fujifilm X-T200
77
 selfie friendly display
 touchscreen enabled
 has face detection focus
 high res video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
 has external microphone port
 no image stabilization
79
 screen is selfie friendly
 touchscreen functionality
 comes with face detection focus
 high quality video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
 comes with external microphone port
 lack of image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	

		

			
Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Canon R50 and Fujifilm X-T200
 Canon EOS R50Fujifilm X-T200
General Information
Manufacturer Canon FujiFilm
Model Canon EOS R50 Fujifilm X-T200
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2023-02-08 2020-01-22
Body design SLR-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor measurements 22.3 x 14.9mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 332.3mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 24MP
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Highest resolution 6000 x 4000 6000 x 4000
Highest native ISO 32000 12800
Highest boosted ISO 51200 51200
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW support    
Min boosted ISO - 100
Autofocusing
Manual focus    
Touch to focus    
Continuous AF    
AF single    
Tracking AF    
Selective AF    
AF center weighted    
AF multi area    
AF live view    
Face detection AF    
Contract detection AF    
Phase detection AF    
Number of focus points 651 425
Lens
Lens mounting type Canon RF Fujifilm X
Amount of lenses 37 54
Crop factor 1.6 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fully Articulated
Screen sizing 3.00" 3.5"
Screen resolution 1,040k dot 2,780k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch screen    
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.59x 0.62x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/8000s 1/32000s
Continuous shooting speed 12.0 frames/s 8.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash range 6m at ISO 100 7.00 m (at ISO 200)
External flash    
AEB    
White balance bracketing    
Maximum flash sync 1/200s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 230 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 470 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 70 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 90 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 170 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 170 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 85 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 85 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 230 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 470 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 70 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 90 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 3840x2160
Video format MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack    
Headphone jack    
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 375 grams (0.83 lb) 370 grams (0.82 lb)
Physical dimensions 116 x 86 x 69mm (4.6" x 3.4" x 2.7") 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 370 shots 270 shots
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LP-E17 NP-W126S
Self timer Yes Yes
Time lapse feature    
Type of storage Single UHS-II SD card slot SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported)
Storage slots Single Single
Price at launch $679 $699