Olympus E-500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Revealed October 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-500
- Newer Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Following is a thorough overview of the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are sold by Olympus. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-500 was unveiled 8 years before the XZ-2 iHS which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-500 scores vs the XZ-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-500 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| E-500 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-500
| XZ-2 iHS | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | December 2012 | October 2005 | More modern by 87 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 215k | Clearer display (+705k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| E-500 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-500 features exterior dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-500 versus the XZ-2 iHS.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and XZ-2 iHS is 70 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes just by looking through a spec sheet. The pic here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and XZ-2 iHS.
Clearly, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-500 using its larger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will render extra detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus E-500 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-500 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Also called | EVOLT E-500 | - |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2005-10-21 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 215 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 479g (1.06 pounds) | 346g (0.76 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $600 | $450 |