Olympus E-500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Revealed October 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-500
- Newer Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Following is a thorough overview of the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are sold by Olympus. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-500 was unveiled 8 years before the XZ-2 iHS which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-500 scores vs the XZ-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-500 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-500 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-500
XZ-2 iHS | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2012 | October 2005 | More modern by 87 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 215k | Clearer display (+705k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-500 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-500 features exterior dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-500 versus the XZ-2 iHS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and XZ-2 iHS is 70 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes just by looking through a spec sheet. The pic here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and XZ-2 iHS.
Clearly, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-500 using its larger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will render extra detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Also called | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2005-10-21 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 215 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479g (1.06 pounds) | 346g (0.76 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $600 | $450 |