Canon SL2 vs Fujifilm F900EXR
71 Imaging
68 Features
85 Overall
74
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Canon SL2 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 51200)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF/EF-S Mount
- 453g - 122 x 93 x 70mm
- Announced June 2017
- Additionally Known as EOS 200D / Kiss X9
- Succeeded the Canon 100D
- Successor is Canon SL3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm F800EXR
Canon SL2 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Canon SL2 versus Fujifilm F900EXR, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Canon and FujiFilm. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the SL2 (24MP) and Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the SL2 (APS-C) and Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") provide totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SL2 was unveiled 4 years later than the Fujifilm F900EXR and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Canon SL2 being a Compact SLR camera and the Fujifilm F900EXR being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summation of how the SL2 matches up vs the Fujifilm F900EXR when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Canon SL2 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Canon EOS Rebel SL2 & Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR. The full galleries are viewable at Canon SL2 Gallery & Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SL2 over the Fujifilm F900EXR
SL2 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2017 | January 2013 | More recent by 54 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 920k | Clearer screen (+120k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Canon SL2
Fujifilm F900EXR | SL2 |
---|
Common features in the Canon SL2 and Fujifilm F900EXR
SL2 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size |
Canon SL2 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon SL2 enjoys outer dimensions of 122mm x 93mm x 70mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 2.8") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm F900EXR has dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Canon SL2 versus Fujifilm F900EXR in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the SL2 against the Fujifilm F900EXR.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SL2 and Fujifilm F900EXR is 71 and 90 respectively.
Canon SL2 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to see the gap in sensor measurements simply by going through technical specs. The photograph here should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SL2 and Fujifilm F900EXR.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The SL2 using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Canon SL2 will provide greater detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger SL2 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon SL2 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SL2 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Specifications
Canon EOS Rebel SL2 | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model type | Canon EOS Rebel SL2 | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR |
Also called | EOS 200D / Kiss X9 | - |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2017-06-29 | 2013-01-30 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | DIGIC 7 | EXR II |
Sensor type | CMOS | EXRCMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2" |
Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 30.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | 51200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | 1 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Canon EF/EF-S | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.3 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 326 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 5.6 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.54x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | 11.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.80 m (at ISO 100) | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/200 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 453g (1.00 pounds) | 232g (0.51 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 93 x 70mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 2.8") | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 79 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1041 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 photos | 260 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LP-E17 | NP-50A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $699 | $380 |