Canon SL2 vs Leica D-Lux Typ 109
71 Imaging
67 Features
85 Overall
74
82 Imaging
51 Features
70 Overall
58
Canon SL2 vs Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Increase to 51200)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF/EF-S Mount
- 453g - 122 x 93 x 70mm
- Released June 2017
- Additionally Known as EOS 200D / Kiss X9
- Succeeded the Canon 100D
- Replacement is Canon SL3
(Full Review)
- 13MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-75mm (F1.7-2.8) lens
- 405g - 118 x 66 x 55mm
- Announced September 2014
- Alternate Name is Typ 109
Canon SL2 vs Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Canon SL2 vs Leica D-Lux Typ 109, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Canon and Leica. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the SL2 (24MP) and D-Lux Typ 109 (13MP) and the SL2 (APS-C) and D-Lux Typ 109 (Four Thirds) come with different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SL2 was introduced 2 years later than the D-Lux Typ 109 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Canon SL2 being a Compact SLR camera and the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the SL2 matches up vs the D-Lux Typ 109 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Canon SL2 vs Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon EOS Rebel SL2 and Leica D-Lux Typ 109. The whole galleries are available at Canon SL2 Gallery and Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SL2 over the Leica D-Lux Typ 109
SL2 | D-Lux Typ 109 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2017 | September 2014 | More recent by 34 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 921k | Crisper screen (+119k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Leica D-Lux Typ 109 over the Canon SL2
D-Lux Typ 109 | SL2 |
---|
Common features in the Canon SL2 and Leica D-Lux Typ 109
SL2 | D-Lux Typ 109 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Canon SL2 vs Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon SL2 offers exterior measurements of 122mm x 93mm x 70mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 2.8") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 has dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 55mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 2.2") with a weight of 405 grams (0.89 lbs).
Contrast the Canon SL2 vs Leica D-Lux Typ 109 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the SL2 and the D-Lux Typ 109.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SL2 and D-Lux Typ 109 is 71 and 82 respectively.
Canon SL2 vs Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements merely by viewing technical specs. The photograph underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SL2 and D-Lux Typ 109.
As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The SL2 with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Canon SL2 will render more detail using its extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more recent SL2 provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Canon SL2 vs Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SL2 vs Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Specifications
Canon EOS Rebel SL2 | Leica D-Lux Typ 109 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Leica |
Model type | Canon EOS Rebel SL2 | Leica D-Lux Typ 109 |
Otherwise known as | EOS 200D / Kiss X9 | Typ 109 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2017-06-29 | 2014-09-23 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | DIGIC 7 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4112 x 3088 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 49 |
Cross type focus points | 1 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Canon EF/EF-S | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-75mm (3.1x) |
Max aperture | - | f/1.7-2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 326 | - |
Crop factor | 1.6 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,760k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.54x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 11.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.80 m (at ISO 100) | 7.00 m (with included external flash at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/200 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 453 gr (1.00 lbs) | 405 gr (0.89 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 93 x 70mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 2.8") | 118 x 66 x 55mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 79 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1041 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 images | 300 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LP-E17 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $699 | $1,095 |