Canon SL2 vs Olympus E-400
71 Imaging
67 Features
85 Overall
74
77 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Canon SL2 vs Olympus E-400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Bump to 51200)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF/EF-S Mount
- 453g - 122 x 93 x 70mm
- Released June 2017
- Alternative Name is EOS 200D / Kiss X9
- Old Model is Canon 100D
- Updated by Canon SL3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Successor is Olympus E-410
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SL2 vs Olympus E-400 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Canon SL2 vs Olympus E-400, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the SL2 (24MP) and E-400 (10MP) and the SL2 (APS-C) and E-400 (Four Thirds) feature different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SL2 was manufactured 10 years later than the E-400 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact SLR).
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the SL2 matches up against the E-400 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SL2 vs Olympus E-400 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon EOS Rebel SL2 & Olympus E-400. The entire galleries are provided at Canon SL2 Gallery & Olympus E-400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SL2 over the Olympus E-400
| SL2 | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2017 |  | September 2006 | Fresher by 132 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 215k | Sharper screen (+825k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Canon SL2
| E-400 | SL2 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SL2 and Olympus E-400
| SL2 | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing |
Canon SL2 vs Olympus E-400 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and size. The Canon SL2 provides exterior measurements of 122mm x 93mm x 70mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 2.8") having a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Olympus E-400 has specifications of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).
Examine the Canon SL2 vs Olympus E-400 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the SL2 vs the E-400.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SL2 and E-400 is 71 and 77 respectively.
Canon SL2 vs Olympus E-400 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing only by looking at specifications. The photograph here will give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SL2 and E-400.
To sum up, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The SL2 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Canon SL2 will give more detail due to its extra 14MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher SL2 should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Canon SL2 vs Olympus E-400 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon SL2 vs Olympus E-400 Specifications
| Canon EOS Rebel SL2 | Olympus E-400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon EOS Rebel SL2 | Olympus E-400 |
| Also called | EOS 200D / Kiss X9 | - |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2017-06-29 | 2006-09-14 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 7 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 3 |
| Cross focus points | 1 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Canon EF/EF-S | Micro Four Thirds |
| Total lenses | 326 | 45 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 215 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.54x | 0.46x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 9.80 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/200s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 453g (1.00 lbs) | 435g (0.96 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 93 x 70mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 2.8") | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 79 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 13.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 1041 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 650 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LP-E17 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I compatible) | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $699 | $599 |