Canon SL2 vs Olympus E-420
71 Imaging
67 Features
85 Overall
74
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Canon SL2 vs Olympus E-420 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Expand to 51200)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF/EF-S Mount
- 453g - 122 x 93 x 70mm
- Introduced June 2017
- Other Name is EOS 200D / Kiss X9
- Succeeded the Canon 100D
- Replacement is Canon SL3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced June 2008
- Older Model is Olympus E-410
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SL2 vs Olympus E-420 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Canon SL2 and Olympus E-420, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras by brands Canon and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the SL2 (24MP) and E-420 (10MP) and the SL2 (APS-C) and E-420 (Four Thirds) possess different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SL2 was introduced 9 years later than the E-420 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact SLR).
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the SL2 scores against the E-420 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SL2 vs Olympus E-420 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon EOS Rebel SL2 & Olympus E-420. The whole galleries are available at Canon SL2 Gallery & Olympus E-420 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SL2 over the Olympus E-420
| SL2 | E-420 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2017 |  | June 2008 | Fresher by 110 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Canon SL2
| E-420 | SL2 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SL2 and Olympus E-420
| SL2 | E-420 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus |
Canon SL2 vs Olympus E-420 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Canon SL2 features external dimensions of 122mm x 93mm x 70mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 2.8") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-420 has sizing of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Examine the Canon SL2 and Olympus E-420 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Following is the front view scale comparison of the SL2 vs the E-420.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SL2 and E-420 is 71 and 77 respectively.
Canon SL2 vs Olympus E-420 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specs. The visual below might offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SL2 and E-420.
All in all, each of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The SL2 using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Canon SL2 will deliver greater detail using its extra 14 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The fresher SL2 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SL2 vs Olympus E-420 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon SL2 vs Olympus E-420 Specifications
| Canon EOS Rebel SL2 | Olympus E-420 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon EOS Rebel SL2 | Olympus E-420 |
| Also called | EOS 200D / Kiss X9 | - |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2017-06-29 | 2008-06-23 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 7 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 3 |
| Cross type focus points | 1 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Canon EF/EF-S | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 326 | 45 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.54x | 0.46x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 9.80 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/200s | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 453 grams (1.00 lbs) | 426 grams (0.94 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 93 x 70mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 2.8") | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 79 | 56 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | 21.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.4 | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | 1041 | 527 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 650 photographs | 500 photographs |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LP-E17 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I compatible) | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $699 | $999 |