Canon Elph 115 IS vs Konica Minolta 5D
96 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37


64 Imaging
44 Features
38 Overall
41
Canon Elph 115 IS vs Konica Minolta 5D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.7-5.9) lens
- 135g - 93 x 57 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Alternate Name is IXUS 132 HS
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 670g - 131 x 93 x 67mm
- Announced July 2005
- Alternative Name is Dynax 5D
- Replacement is Sony A100

Canon Elph 115 IS vs Konica Minolta 5D Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Canon Elph 115 IS vs Konica Minolta 5D, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Canon and Konica. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the Elph 115 IS (16MP) and Minolta 5D (6MP) and the Elph 115 IS (1/2.3") and Minolta 5D (APS-C) feature totally different sensor sizing.

The Elph 115 IS was brought out 7 years after the Minolta 5D which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Canon Elph 115 IS being a Ultracompact camera and the Konica Minolta 5D being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a brief summation of how the Elph 115 IS scores vs the Minolta 5D in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Canon Elph 115 IS vs Konica Minolta 5D Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon Elph 115 IS & Konica Minolta Maxxum 5D. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon Elph 115 IS Gallery & Konica Minolta 5D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon Elph 115 IS over the Konica Minolta 5D
Elph 115 IS | Minolta 5D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2005 | More modern by 92 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 115k | Clearer screen (+346k dot) |
Reasons to pick Konica Minolta 5D over the Canon Elph 115 IS
Minolta 5D | Elph 115 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Canon Elph 115 IS and Konica Minolta 5D
Elph 115 IS | Minolta 5D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Canon Elph 115 IS vs Konica Minolta 5D Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Canon Elph 115 IS comes with external measurements of 93mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Konica Minolta 5D has proportions of 131mm x 93mm x 67mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 2.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Examine the Canon Elph 115 IS vs Konica Minolta 5D in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the Elph 115 IS against the Minolta 5D.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Elph 115 IS and Minolta 5D is 96 and 64 respectively.

Canon Elph 115 IS vs Konica Minolta 5D Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading through specs. The image here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Elph 115 IS and Minolta 5D.
As you can plainly see, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Elph 115 IS because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Canon Elph 115 IS will give extra detail having its extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The fresher Elph 115 IS is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Canon Elph 115 IS vs Konica Minolta 5D Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon Elph 115 IS vs Konica Minolta 5D Specifications
Canon Elph 115 IS | Konica Minolta Maxxum 5D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Konica |
Model | Canon Elph 115 IS | Konica Minolta Maxxum 5D |
Also called | IXUS 132 HS | Dynax 5D |
Class | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2005-07-15 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | DIGIC 5 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 6MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3008 x 2000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Cross focus points | 1 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.7-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | PureColor II G TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 135g (0.30 lbs) | 670g (1.48 lbs) |
Dimensions | 93 x 57 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 131 x 93 x 67mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 58 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 605 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 170 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-11L | NP-400 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $225 | $1,100 |