Clicky

Canon A1200 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
19
Overall
28
Canon PowerShot A1200 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Canon A1200 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Canon A1200
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 185g - 98 x 63 x 31mm
  • Launched January 2011
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced July 2011
  • Renewed by Olympus VR-330
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon A1200 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Canon A1200 versus Olympus VR-320, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the A1200 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty similar and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The A1200 was manufactured 6 months prior to the VR-320 and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the A1200 scores versus the VR-320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon A1200 over the Olympus VR-320

 A1200 VR-320 

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Canon A1200

 VR-320 A1200 
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Common features in the Canon A1200 and Olympus VR-320

 A1200 VR-320 
IntroducedJanuary 2011July 2011Similar age
Focus manually Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch screen Neither includes Touch screen

Canon A1200 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon A1200 features external dimensions of 98mm x 63mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 1.2") and a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Take a look at the Canon A1200 versus Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the A1200 versus the VR-320.

Canon A1200 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the A1200 and VR-320 is 92 and 94 respectively.

Canon A1200 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Canon A1200 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizing simply by reviewing technical specs. The photograph underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the A1200 and VR-320.

As you have seen, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus VR-320 to offer extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots way more aggressively.

Canon A1200 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Canon A1200 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A1200 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon A1200 Portrait photography factors
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography factors
26
supports face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
33
MP count good (14 megapixels)
supports face detect focusing
no manual focus
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon A1200
Street photography with Olympus VR-320
46
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (158g)
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Canon A1200 Sports photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography highlights
23
supports tracking autofocus
max frames per second low (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery (200 per charge)
lacks phase detect autofocus
47
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Travel Comparison

Canon A1200 Travel photography advice
Olympus VR-320 Travel photography advice
55
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse mode
bad battery (200 per charge)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
70
lighter than average in class (158g)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
no Time Lapse function
doesn't have selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Canon A1200
Landscape photography with Olympus VR-320
27
relatively wide (28mm)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
bad battery (200 CIPA)
no Time Lapse mode
42
decently wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14MP)
no manual focus
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
no Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A1200 Vlogging features
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging features
27
relatively wide (28mm)
supports face detection autofocus
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external mic support
32
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focusing
lighter than average in class (158 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no mic jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon A1200 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A1200 and Olympus VR-320
 Canon PowerShot A1200Olympus VR-320
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Olympus
Model Canon PowerShot A1200 Olympus VR-320
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2011-01-05 2011-07-19
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Max aperture f/2.8-5.9 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus range 3cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology TFT LCD TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (tunnel) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/1600s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.00 m 4.70 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 185 gr (0.41 lbs) 158 gr (0.35 lbs)
Physical dimensions 98 x 63 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 1.2") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 200 pictures -
Battery format AA -
Battery model 2 x AA LI-42B
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus SD/SDHC
Storage slots One One
Retail cost $109 $179