Canon A1300 vs Nikon S33
93 Imaging
39 Features
23 Overall
32


91 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
Canon A1300 vs Nikon S33 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 174g - 95 x 62 x 30mm
- Released February 2012
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/3.1" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 30-90mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 221g - 110 x 66 x 27mm
- Released February 2015

Exploring Everyday Compact Cameras: Canon PowerShot A1300 vs. Nikon Coolpix S33 in Real Life
Navigating the world of small sensor compacts is like picking the right tool for casual yet capable photography. Over my 15-plus years of camera testing, I’ve seen how tiny bodies can sometimes surprise us with outstanding utility - even if these aren’t the pro-heavyweights. This time, I tested two approachable models from well-known brands: the Canon PowerShot A1300 (2012) and the Nikon Coolpix S33 (2015). They both land in the affordable compact category, but each brings quirks and capabilities worth unpacking before you make a choice.
I spent weeks shooting landscapes, street scenes, and family moments with these cameras, jabbing through menus, and squeezing every bit of performance out of their modest specs. Let’s dive deep into how they stack up.
Feeling the Size: Ergonomics and Build
At first glance, the Canon A1300 and Nikon S33 look similar on paper - a pocketable compact class with fixed zoom lenses. Still, their ergonomics show subtly different philosophies. The Canon measures 95x62x30mm and weighs just 174g, powered by 2xAA batteries - a design that screams “grab and go” with those easy-to-find batteries, especially important if you’re traveling light or off-grid.
The Nikon, slightly chunkier at 110x66x27mm and 221g, trades some compactness for a reassuringly solid feel. It runs on a proprietary EN-EL19 battery, which may require charging and spares, slightly reducing the convenience factor I felt with the Canon’s AAs. Its design puts a bit more emphasis on durability, even touting environmental sealing - a rare feature in this class, hinting at better resilience around damp or dusty environments.
Handling-wise, both are easy to grip with small hands, but the Canon’s lighter body feels more toy-like, while the Nikon’s weight adds a touch of confidence. Neither offers extensive external controls or customizable buttons; instead, simplicity dominates.
Control Layout and Interface: Usability Up Close
The top panel and back controls reflect similar entry-level simplicity, but nuances impact shooting ease. Here’s the top view comparison:
On the Canon, the small mode dial is integrated around the shutter button, offering just automatic scene modes mostly. Nikon simplifies further with a minimalist power button and shutter release without distracting dials. Neither lets you manually tweak exposure settings or ISO - proof that these cameras aim for novice users who want the camera to think for them.
Their 2.7-inch fixed LCDs share a basic 230k-dot resolution, adequate but far from sharp:
Neither utilizes touchscreen controls, so all navigation relies on conventional button presses. The Canon provides standard menus with limited options, while Nikon’s interface feels a bit more playful, including a “smile timer” feature hinting at a consumer styling towards families or casual shooters.
Sensor Tech and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Digging under the hood, sensor specifications dramatically affect how these cameras perform in real-world shooting, so here’s a direct size comparison to contextualize:
The Canon A1300 utilizes a 1/2.3" CCD sensor with 16 megapixels. The Nikon S33 employs a smaller 1/3.1" CMOS sensor with 13 megapixels. Generally, CCD sensors in small compacts from the early 2010s deliver good color accuracy in daylight but tend to struggle a bit with noise at higher ISOs. Meanwhile, CMOS sensors - while somewhat smaller on the Nikon - offer improved power efficiency and advanced processing, which usually translates to better noise handling and faster readout speeds.
From my direct shooting comparisons in bright daylight, both cameras produce adequately detailed photos, but with noticeably different character. The Canon yields slightly richer colors and a softer tonal rendition, particularly flattering for portraits but sometimes less punchy. The Nikon images feel a bit cooler, with a tendency towards more clipped highlights under bright skies.
Low light is where the CMOS sensor’s advantage becomes more apparent. Despite both cameras topping out at ISO 1600, Nikon’s S33 retains more texture and less chroma noise - though grain becomes obvious beyond ISO 800 for both. The Canon’s older CCD sensor shows more color shifts and graininess, limiting usability as evening falls.
Lens Characteristics: Zoom, Aperture, and Macrocapabilities
Focal length range and aperture variability are important factors when considering versatility. The Canon A1300’s lens covers 28-140mm equivalent, a 5x zoom with a faster max aperture of F2.8-6.9. This wider angle and relatively bright F2.8 at the short end help it stand out a bit for landscape and indoor photography. Meanwhile, the Nikon S33 offers a shorter 30-90mm (3x zoom) at F3.3-5.9, restricting reach but maintaining somewhat consistent brightness for casual shooting.
Macro focusing distances differ slightly: Canon claims a tight 3cm close focusing distance, great for flower or product shots. Nikon settles for 5cm, still adequate but less versatile in tight macro work. Neither camera has image stabilization built-in for the Canon, while the Nikon boasts digital stabilization - useful for video and handheld snaps but less effective than true optical systems.
Autofocus and Shooting Speeds: Capturing the Moment
Both cameras utilize contrast-detection AF systems aligned to their compact sensor tech. However, the Canon offers 9 focus points with face detection, which surprised me for an entry-level model. Its AF feels a bit sluggish in dim light, often hunting before locking on - a common trait with older CCDs and limited processing power.
The Nikon leans on a simpler AF arrangement without multi-area focus, relying mostly on center-weighted AF and face detection activated through live view. It compensates with a faster continuous shooting mode - up to 4.7fps - making it better suited for quick-action snaps or capturing fleeting expressions. Canon’s single fps continuous shooting often feels too slow for anything beyond steady scenes.
Neither camera supports raw shooting, which is a notable downside for enthusiasts who want post-processing flexibility.
Flash and Low Light Performance
Both cameras carry built-in flashes with roughly 3-meter ranges, enough for close portraits or fill light indoors. The Canon’s flash modes are more explicitly controlled (Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync), while the Nikon’s flash settings are mostly automatic. Neither camera supports external flash units, limiting lighting control.
In dim environments, neither camera excels due to sensor and lens limitations. The Nikon’s digital stabilization helps marginally in reducing blur on video or long exposure stills, but still, expect grain and softness in shadows.
Video Recording Features: Simple Capture for Social Sharing
Video capability is basic on both cameras but worth noting. The Canon shoots 720p HD at 25fps - the minimum standard HD. The Nikon S33 offers 720p at both 25fps and 30fps, plus an upscaled 1080p option through MPEG-4 and H.264 encoding.
Neither has microphone or headphone jacks, so audio quality is limited to their internal mics. The Nikon includes HDMI output, convenient for connecting to larger screens, while Canon lacks this altogether.
Neither supports 4K video, slow motion, or advanced filming features, reinforcing their positioning as casual still photographers with occasional video needs.
Durability and Travel Friendliness
Interestingly, the Nikon S33 is environmentally sealed, offering splash resistance and dust protection - a valuable trait if you shoot outdoors or in unpredictable conditions. The Canon A1300 comes without any weather sealing, demanding more careful handling.
Regarding battery life, both deliver roughly 220 shots per charge or set of batteries. Canon’s use of AA batteries may appeal to those who want quick roadside replacements without needing chargers, while Nikon’s rechargeable battery adds convenience for planned usage but risk of being caught without juice.
On weight and size, Canon’s lighter body edges it for travel packing and street shooting where discreetness counts. The Nikon’s extra robustness means it fits better with rugged adventures or family vacations that might expose gear to elements.
Image Gallery: Real-World Samples Side-by-Side
I gathered a few comparative shots in varying scenarios - from sunlit street corners to dim interiors and some playful macros - to visually represent how these cameras perform:
You can see the Canon tends towards warmer, fuller colors with smoother transitions - ideal if you're focused on portraits or everyday snapshots. The Nikon presents sharper contrast but occasionally harsher highlights; details hold up fairly well but colors skew cooler.
Scoring the Cameras: What the Numbers Say
Below is an overall performance rating summary based on hands-on testing combining image quality, autofocus, ergonomics, and versatility:
Canon PowerShot A1300 scores well for value and ease of use in bright conditions but falls behind in speed and low light. Nikon Coolpix S33 ranks higher for autofocus responsiveness, video options, and durability, reflecting its more modern design philosophy.
Photography Specialties: Which Camera Shines Where?
When I break down performance by photography genres, this chart helps highlight strengths:
- Portraits: Canon edges out with its wider lens and smoother skin tones.
- Landscapes: Canon’s wider-angle lens and color reproduction work nicely, but Nikon’s dynamic range still suffers.
- Wildlife and Sports: Neither are ideal, but Nikon’s faster burst and AF give it a slight advantage for kids and pets.
- Street Photography: Canon’s lighter body favors discreet snaps.
- Macro: Canon’s closer focusing distance and more prominent bokeh excel.
- Night/Astro: Neither excels due to sensor limitations.
- Video: Nikon’s 1080p and HDMI port are significant pluses.
- Travel: Nikon’s weather resistance and robust build provide peace of mind, though Canon’s compact size helps portability.
- Professional Work: Neither supports raw files or manual exposure; both are strictly consumer-level.
Wrapping Up: Who Should Buy Which?
To be fully transparent - I have no affiliations or sponsorships with Canon or Nikon for this review; these are strictly independent observations from extensive field trials.
If you seek an affordable, ultraportable camera mainly for casual daylight shooting, family outings, and street photography, the Canon PowerShot A1300 will serve you well. Its brighter lens, lightweight design, and easy AA battery power make it fuss-free and travel-friendly.
Conversely, if your priorities lean towards a tougher camera that handles quick shooting and moderate video use with better autofocus responsiveness, the Nikon Coolpix S33 is the smarter pick. Environmental sealing and HDMI output enhance its appeal for outdoor adventures and casual multimedia creation, despite the smaller sensor and limited zoom.
Final Practical Advice from My Experience
- For beginners and casual users, Canon’s simplicity and lighter weight help ease the learning curve.
- For families with active kids or those shooting outdoors a lot, Nikon’s durability and speed stand out.
- Don’t expect excellent low-light or professional-grade images from either - but both deliver satisfying 720p HD video suitable for online sharing.
- Because neither supports raw or manual exposure, consider these cameras complementary to smartphone photography or as backups rather than main creative tools.
- Always test battery availability - AA for Canon offers convenience, whereas Nikon’s rechargeable pack requires planning.
Both cameras are modest entry-level compacts from an era before smartphone photography truly dominated. If you prize portability and easy shooting over pro-level features, one of these could still find a place in your photography kit.
Thank you for joining me on this detailed side-by-side exploration. My hope is that the combination of hands-on insights, technical breakdowns, and honest critique helps you decide which compact camera suits your photographic journey best. Happy shooting!
Canon A1300 vs Nikon S33 Specifications
Canon PowerShot A1300 | Nikon Coolpix S33 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Nikon |
Model type | Canon PowerShot A1300 | Nikon Coolpix S33 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-02-07 | 2015-02-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/3.1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 4.7 x 3.5mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 16.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4160 x 3120 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 30-90mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 7.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (tunnel) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | 4.7 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.10 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p), 320 x 240 (30p, 25p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 174g (0.38 lb) | 221g (0.49 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 30mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 110 x 66 x 27mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | 220 shots |
Style of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 2 x AA | EN-EL19 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10 sec, smile timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $119 | $150 |