Canon A2200 vs Olympus Tough-3000
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Canon A2200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 135g - 93 x 57 x 24mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 3000
Photography Glossary Canon A2200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Canon A2200 versus Olympus Tough-3000, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the A2200 (14MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe A2200 was announced 13 months later than the Tough-3000 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the A2200 matches up vs the Tough-3000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon A2200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot A2200 and Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The whole galleries are provided at Canon A2200 Gallery and Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A2200 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| A2200 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Canon A2200
| Tough-3000 | A2200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon A2200 and Olympus Tough-3000
| A2200 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Same screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Canon A2200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Canon A2200 comes with outer dimensions of 93mm x 57mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus Tough-3000 has sizing of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Canon A2200 versus Olympus Tough-3000 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the A2200 against the Tough-3000.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the A2200 and Tough-3000 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Canon A2200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing purely by seeing specifications. The graphic underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the A2200 and Tough-3000.
To sum up, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Canon A2200 to provide more detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more modern A2200 will have an edge in sensor innovation.
Canon A2200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon A2200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A2200 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A2200 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
| Alternate name | - | mju Tough 3000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 135g (0.30 lbs) | 159g (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 280 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-8L | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $139 | $0 |
