Clicky

Canon A2300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ

Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
25
Overall
33
Canon PowerShot A2300 front
 
Olympus SP-565UZ front
Portability
72
Imaging
33
Features
32
Overall
32

Canon A2300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs

Canon A2300
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
  • 125g - 95 x 54 x 20mm
  • Revealed February 2012
Olympus SP-565UZ
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
  • Introduced January 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Canon A2300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview

Here, we will be matching up the Canon A2300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Canon and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the A2300 (16MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The A2300 was brought out 3 years later than the SP-565UZ and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the A2300 scores against the SP-565UZ when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon A2300 over the Olympus SP-565UZ

 A2300 SP-565UZ 
IntroducedFebruary 2012January 2009More recent by 38 months
Screen size2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Canon A2300

 SP-565UZ A2300 
Manual focus More accurate focusing

Common features in the Canon A2300 and Olympus SP-565UZ

 A2300 SP-565UZ 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Canon A2300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to lug around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon A2300 features physical measurements of 95mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Olympus SP-565UZ has dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).

Examine the Canon A2300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the A2300 vs the SP-565UZ.

Canon A2300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A2300 and SP-565UZ is 96 and 72 respectively.

Canon A2300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison

Canon A2300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements merely by going over a spec sheet. The visual here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the A2300 and SP-565UZ.

As you can see, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can count on the Canon A2300 to deliver extra detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The fresher A2300 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Canon A2300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison

Canon A2300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A2300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon A2300 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus SP-565UZ as a Portrait photography camera
34
good resolution (16MP)
supports face detection focus
no manual focus
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
39
focusing manually
saves RAW formats
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Canon A2300 Street photography information
Olympus SP-565UZ Street photography information
56
lighter than competitors (125g)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
56
has image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Canon A2300 Sports photography highlights
Olympus SP-565UZ Sports photography highlights
32
good resolution (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
slow frames per second (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (210 shots)
lack of phase detect auto focus
33
great zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Canon A2300 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus SP-565UZ as a Travel photography camera
66
lighter than competitors (125g)
good resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
no Timelapse function
terrible battery power (210 CIPA)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.8)
52
flash built-in
rather wide (26mm)
very long reach (520mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Canon A2300 Landscape photography features
Olympus SP-565UZ Landscape photography features
33
quite wide (28mm)
good resolution (16MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
terrible battery power (210 shots)
no Timelapse function
40
focusing manually
rather wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.5 inches)
low megapixels (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A2300 Vlogging information
Olympus SP-565UZ Vlogging information
30
quite wide (28mm)
supports face detection focus
lighter than competitors (125g)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external microphone jack
24
rather wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon A2300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A2300 and Olympus SP-565UZ
 Canon PowerShot A2300Olympus SP-565UZ
General Information
Brand Name Canon Olympus
Model type Canon PowerShot A2300 Olympus SP-565UZ
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2012-02-07 2009-01-15
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 64
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 9 143
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 26-520mm (20.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8-6.9 f/2.8-4.5
Macro focusing distance 3cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 2.5 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 secs 1 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames per sec 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 6.40 m (ISO 200)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format H.264 -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 125 gr (0.28 lb) 413 gr (0.91 lb)
Physical dimensions 95 x 54 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 30
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 18.7
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.1
DXO Low light rating not tested 68
Other
Battery life 210 images -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID NB-11L 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC xD Picture Card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $139 $400