Canon A2300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
96 Imaging
39 Features
25 Overall
33
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Canon A2300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 125g - 95 x 54 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2009
Canon A2300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Canon A2300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Canon and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the A2300 (16MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe A2300 was brought out 3 years later than the SP-565UZ and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the A2300 scores against the SP-565UZ when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Canon A2300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot A2300 & Olympus SP-565UZ. The entire galleries are available at Canon A2300 Gallery & Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A2300 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
A2300 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | January 2009 | More recent by 38 months | |
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Canon A2300
SP-565UZ | A2300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing |
Common features in the Canon A2300 and Olympus SP-565UZ
A2300 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Canon A2300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon A2300 features physical measurements of 95mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Olympus SP-565UZ has dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Examine the Canon A2300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the A2300 vs the SP-565UZ.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A2300 and SP-565UZ is 96 and 72 respectively.
Canon A2300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements merely by going over a spec sheet. The visual here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the A2300 and SP-565UZ.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can count on the Canon A2300 to deliver extra detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The fresher A2300 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon A2300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon A2300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Canon PowerShot A2300 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon PowerShot A2300 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-02-07 | 2009-01-15 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 1 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lb) | 413 gr (0.91 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 54 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 30 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-11L | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $139 | $400 |