Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-310
96 Imaging
38 Features
25 Overall
32
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 125g - 95 x 54 x 20mm
- Released February 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-310, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the A2300 (16MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe A2300 was announced 14 months after the TG-310 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise overview of how the A2300 grades versus the TG-310 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot A2300 and Olympus TG-310. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon A2300 Gallery and Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A2300 over the Olympus TG-310
| A2300 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2012 | January 2011 | Newer by 14 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Canon A2300
| TG-310 | A2300 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon A2300 and Olympus TG-310
| A2300 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal screen sizing | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Canon A2300 offers physical dimensions of 95mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-310 has specifications of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Look at the Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-310 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the A2300 versus the TG-310.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A2300 and TG-310 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions purely by checking technical specs. The image below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the A2300 and TG-310.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Canon A2300 to give extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The newer A2300 will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A2300 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A2300 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-02-07 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lbs) | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 54 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photos | 150 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-11L | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $139 | $0 |