Clicky

Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-310

Portability
96
Imaging
38
Features
25
Overall
32
Canon PowerShot A2300 front
 
Olympus TG-310 front
Portability
94
Imaging
36
Features
33
Overall
34

Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs

Canon A2300
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
  • 125g - 95 x 54 x 20mm
  • Released February 2012
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Released January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-310, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the A2300 (16MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The A2300 was announced 14 months after the TG-310 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise overview of how the A2300 grades versus the TG-310 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Canon A2300 over the Olympus TG-310

 A2300 TG-310 
ReleasedFebruary 2012January 2011Newer by 14 months

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Canon A2300

 TG-310 A2300 

Common features in the Canon A2300 and Olympus TG-310

 A2300 TG-310 
Manual focus No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions2.7"2.7"Equal screen sizing
Screen resolution230k230kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison

If you're going to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Canon A2300 offers physical dimensions of 95mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-310 has specifications of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Look at the Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-310 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the A2300 versus the TG-310.

Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A2300 and TG-310 is 96 and 94 respectively.

Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison

Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions purely by checking technical specs. The image below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the A2300 and TG-310.

As you can tell, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Canon A2300 to give extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The newer A2300 will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison

Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon A2300 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-310 as a Portrait photography camera
34
decent megapixels (16MP)
offers face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
33
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
provides face detection focusing
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon A2300
Street photography with Olympus TG-310
56
lighter than others (125g)
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
lighter than competition (155g)
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Canon A2300 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-310 as a Sports photography camera
31
decent megapixels (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
max fps low (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
bad battery life (210 per charge)
no phase detect autofocus
40
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
weather proof
max frames per second very slow (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (150 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Canon A2300 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-310 as a Travel photography camera
66
lighter than others (125 grams)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
no Timelapse recording
bad battery life (210 CIPA)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
67
lighter than competition (155 grams)
weather proof
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse recording
terrible battery power (150 CIPA)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Landscape Comparison

Canon A2300 Landscape photography info
Olympus TG-310 Landscape photography info
33
rather wide (28mm)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
bad battery life (210 per charge)
no Timelapse recording
39
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
weather proof
manual focus not available
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
tiny screen (2.7")
lack of manual mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
terrible battery power (150 CIPA)
no Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A2300 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-310 as a Vlogging camera
30
rather wide (28mm)
offers face detection autofocus
lighter than others (125g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external microphone port
32
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focusing
lighter than competition (155 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external mic port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A2300 and Olympus TG-310
 Canon PowerShot A2300Olympus TG-310
General Information
Brand Name Canon Olympus
Model Canon PowerShot A2300 Olympus TG-310
Category Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Released 2012-02-07 2011-01-06
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-6.9 f/3.9-5.9
Macro focus range 3cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7" 2.7"
Display resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 1.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m 4.20 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 125 grams (0.28 lbs) 155 grams (0.34 lbs)
Physical dimensions 95 x 54 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 210 photos 150 photos
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NB-11L LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Retail pricing $139 $0