Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
96 Imaging
39 Features
25 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/525e6/525e61c3e231d75ec0afe199fbf235594f249210" alt="Canon PowerShot A2300 front Canon PowerShot A2300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e50f/1e50fad8a32efe751efae0d6317d26784ad1ed5c" alt="Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front"
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 125g - 95 x 54 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Lets look much closer at the Canon A2300 and Olympus TG-2 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the A2300 (16MP) and TG-2 iHS (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The A2300 was manufactured 16 months before the TG-2 iHS which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the A2300 matches up against the TG-2 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot A2300 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The entire galleries are available at Canon A2300 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A2300 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
A2300 | TG-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Canon A2300
TG-2 iHS | A2300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2013 | ![]() | February 2012 | More modern by 16 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 610k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A2300 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
A2300 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon A2300 comes with exterior dimensions of 95mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Olympus TG-2 iHS has proportions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check the Canon A2300 and Olympus TG-2 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the A2300 compared to the TG-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00f61/00f61b7448b99aea3939fe484c8a9e936305e9db" alt="Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS size comparison Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the A2300 and TG-2 iHS is 96 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/194a4/194a42669ea67f911b9e984e5505eda63157f44b" alt="Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to see the difference between sensor sizes just by reading specs. The picture underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the A2300 and TG-2 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Canon A2300 to offer you more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged A2300 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa49d/fa49da012c3b0fa9126f558a1341f35a58a4cf09" alt="Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS sensor size comparison Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78f69/78f69d5daaa145416335110951f4573bc27afc48" alt="Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
Canon PowerShot A2300 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot A2300 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2012-02-07 | 2013-06-28 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 610k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 125g (0.28 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
Dimensions | 95 x 54 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 shots | 350 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-11L | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $139 | $380 |