Clicky

Canon A2500 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
29
Overall
35
Canon PowerShot A2500 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Canon A2500 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Canon A2500
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
  • 135g - 98 x 56 x 20mm
  • Announced January 2013
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced July 2011
  • Newer Model is Olympus VR-330
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon A2500 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Here is a detailed review of the Canon A2500 and Olympus VR-320, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the A2500 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The A2500 was introduced 19 months later than the VR-320 making them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the A2500 scores versus the VR-320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Canon A2500 over the Olympus VR-320

 A2500 VR-320 
IntroducedJanuary 2013July 2011Fresher by 19 months

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Canon A2500

 VR-320 A2500 

Common features in the Canon A2500 and Olympus VR-320

 A2500 VR-320 
Manually focus No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurement
Display resolution230k230kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display No Touch friendly display

Canon A2500 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to carry your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Canon A2500 provides external measurements of 98mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

See the Canon A2500 and Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the A2500 and the VR-320.

Canon A2500 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the A2500 and VR-320 is 96 and 94 respectively.

Canon A2500 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Canon A2500 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Usually, its hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing merely by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the A2500 and VR-320.

Clearly, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should anticipate the Canon A2500 to produce extra detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more recent A2500 provides a benefit in sensor tech.

Canon A2500 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Canon A2500 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A2500 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon A2500 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Portrait photography camera
34
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
includes face detect focusing
no manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
33
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
supports face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Canon A2500 Street photography factors
Olympus VR-320 Street photography factors
56
lighter than others (135 grams)
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (158 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Canon A2500 Sports photography factors
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography factors
33
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
includes tracking focus
slow frames per second (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
47
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Canon A2500 Travel photography info
Olympus VR-320 Travel photography info
69
lighter than others (135g)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse recording
does not have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
70
lighter than competitors (158g)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
does not contain selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Canon A2500
Landscape photography with Olympus VR-320
38
really wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
no manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
no manual control
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
no Time Lapse recording
42
really wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
manual focus not available
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A2500 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Vlogging camera
30
really wide (28mm)
includes face detect focusing
lighter than others (135g)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no mic support
32
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
lighter than competitors (158g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon A2500 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A2500 and Olympus VR-320
 Canon PowerShot A2500Olympus VR-320
General Information
Make Canon Olympus
Model type Canon PowerShot A2500 Olympus VR-320
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2013-01-29 2011-07-19
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-6.9 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing distance 3cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 1.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 4.70 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 135 gr (0.30 lbs) 158 gr (0.35 lbs)
Physical dimensions 98 x 56 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 220 shots -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID NB-11L LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $109 $179