Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
72 Imaging
32 Features
32 Overall
32
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Released February 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-1
- Successor is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Launched January 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Below is a extensive comparison of the Olympus E-3 and Olympus SP-565UZ, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are built by Olympus. The resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the SP-565UZ (10MP) is very comparable but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-3 was unveiled 11 months before the SP-565UZ so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summation of how the E-3 matches up against the SP-565UZ with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-3 & Olympus SP-565UZ. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| E-3 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus E-3
| SP-565UZ | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2009 | February 2008 | More recent by 11 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus SP-565UZ
| E-3 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
| Display dimensions | 2.5" | 2.5" | Equal display size | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
| Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-3 has got exterior dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-565UZ has measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-3 and Olympus SP-565UZ in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the E-3 vs the SP-565UZ.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and SP-565UZ is 56 and 72 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements just by seeing specifications. The photograph below will give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-3 and SP-565UZ.
Plainly, both the cameras provide the same megapixels but different sensor measurements. The E-3 offers the larger sensor which is going to make achieving bokeh simpler. The older E-3 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
| Olympus E-3 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-3 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2008-02-20 | 2009-01-15 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 143 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 1s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
| Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 890 grams (1.96 pounds) | 413 grams (0.91 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 56 | 30 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | 18.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | 10.1 |
| DXO Low light score | 571 | 68 |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | xD Picture Card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $670 | $400 |