Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus 9000
95 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34


92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 149g - 95 x 57 x 24mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced May 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju 9000

Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus 9000 Overview
The following is a in-depth comparison of the Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus 9000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the A3200 IS (14MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is pretty comparable and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The A3200 IS was revealed 21 months after the 9000 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the A3200 IS grades vs the 9000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot A3200 IS and Olympus Stylus 9000. The full galleries are viewable at Canon A3200 IS Gallery and Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3200 IS over the Olympus 9000
A3200 IS | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | ![]() | May 2009 | Newer by 21 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Canon A3200 IS
9000 | A3200 IS |
---|
Common features in the Canon A3200 IS and Olympus 9000
A3200 IS | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical screen sizing |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Canon A3200 IS features exterior measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Olympus 9000 has specifications of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Compare the Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus 9000 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the A3200 IS versus the 9000.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A3200 IS and 9000 is 95 and 92 respectively.

Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions simply by going through technical specs. The picture below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the A3200 IS and 9000.
As you have seen, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Canon A3200 IS to produce more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher A3200 IS is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A3200 IS vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
Canon PowerShot A3200 IS | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon PowerShot A3200 IS | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
Also Known as | - | mju 9000 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2009-05-14 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 50 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Smart | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 149 grams (0.33 lb) | 225 grams (0.50 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NB-8L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $230 | $300 |