Canon A3400 IS vs Canon SX240 HS
Portability
96 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
96 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
Canon A3400 IS vs Canon SX240 HS Key Specs
Canon A3400 IS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 126g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Released February 2012
Canon SX240 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Released February 2012
- Previous Model is Canon SX230 HS
- Successor is Canon SX260 HS
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon A3400 IS vs Canon SX240 HS Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Canon A3400 IS versus Canon SX240 HS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are designed by Canon. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the A3400 IS (16MP) and SX240 HS (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe A3400 IS was announced about the same time to the SX240 HS and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the A3400 IS matches up vs the SX240 HS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon A3400 IS vs Canon SX240 HS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A3400 IS and Canon PowerShot SX240 HS. The whole galleries are provided at Canon A3400 IS Gallery and Canon SX240 HS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3400 IS over the Canon SX240 HS
| A3400 IS | SX240 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Canon A3400 IS
| SX240 HS | A3400 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A3400 IS and Canon SX240 HS
| A3400 IS | SX240 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2012 |  | February 2012 | Similar generation |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Canon A3400 IS vs Canon SX240 HS Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Canon A3400 IS comes with outer measurements of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Canon SX240 HS has specifications of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check the Canon A3400 IS versus Canon SX240 HS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the A3400 IS versus the SX240 HS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A3400 IS and SX240 HS is 96 and 91 respectively.
Canon A3400 IS vs Canon SX240 HS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions only by reviewing specifications. The image here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the A3400 IS and SX240 HS.
Plainly, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size but different resolution. You should anticipate the Canon A3400 IS to offer greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics way more aggressively.
Canon A3400 IS vs Canon SX240 HS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Canon A3400 IS
Portrait photography with Canon SX240 HS
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has face detection focusing
no manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
focusing manually
includes face detection focusing
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Canon A3400 IS Street photography info
Canon SX240 HS Street photography info
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers touch to focus
lighter than competition in class (126g)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (224g)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sports photography with Canon A3400 IS
Sports photography with Canon SX240 HS
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery life (180 CIPA)
does not have phase detect AF
excellent zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (230 CIPA)
has no phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Canon A3400 IS Travel photography highlights
Canon SX240 HS Travel photography highlights
lighter than competition in class (126g)
offers touch to focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
bad battery life (180 CIPA)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
lighter than competition (224g)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
great zoom (500mm)
no Timelapse mode
terrible battery power (230 CIPA)
megapixel count low (12MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Canon A3400 IS
Landscape photography with Canon SX240 HS
pretty wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
no manual control
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
bad battery life (180 CIPA)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
focusing manually
pretty wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
terrible battery power (230 per charge)
no Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Canon A3400 IS Vlogging highlights
Canon SX240 HS Vlogging highlights
pretty wide (28mm)
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focusing
lighter than competition in class (126g)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone socket
pretty wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (224g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
no external microphone support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon A3400 IS vs Canon SX240 HS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A3400 IS | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Canon |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A3400 IS | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-02-07 | 2012-02-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Digic 5 |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/3.5-6.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 461k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | PureColor II TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 126 grams (0.28 lbs) | 224 grams (0.49 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 pictures | 230 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-11L | NB-6L |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $230 | $0 |