Canon A3400 IS vs Fujifilm F900EXR
Portability
96 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
96 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
90 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
Canon A3400 IS vs Fujifilm F900EXR Key Specs
Canon A3400 IS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 126g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Revealed February 2012
Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Released January 2013
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm F800EXR
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon A3400 IS vs Fujifilm F900EXR Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Canon A3400 IS vs Fujifilm F900EXR, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Canon and FujiFilm. The resolution of the A3400 IS (16MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) is fairly similar but the A3400 IS (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") come with totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe A3400 IS was launched 11 months prior to the Fujifilm F900EXR and they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the A3400 IS scores against the Fujifilm F900EXR in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon A3400 IS vs Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A3400 IS & Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR. The complete galleries are available at Canon A3400 IS Gallery & Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3400 IS over the Fujifilm F900EXR
| A3400 IS | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Canon A3400 IS
| Fujifilm F900EXR | A3400 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | February 2012 | More recent by 11 months |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A3400 IS and Fujifilm F900EXR
| A3400 IS | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Canon A3400 IS vs Fujifilm F900EXR Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Canon A3400 IS comes with outside measurements of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Fujifilm F900EXR has specifications of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check the Canon A3400 IS vs Fujifilm F900EXR in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the A3400 IS vs the Fujifilm F900EXR.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the A3400 IS and Fujifilm F900EXR is 96 and 90 respectively.
Canon A3400 IS vs Fujifilm F900EXR Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements simply by reviewing specifications. The visual underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the A3400 IS and Fujifilm F900EXR.
Plainly, each of the cameras have got the exact same resolution but not the same sensor measurements. The A3400 IS contains the tinier sensor which will make getting shallower depth of field more difficult. The older A3400 IS is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Canon A3400 IS vs Fujifilm F900EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon A3400 IS Portrait photography advice
Fujifilm F900EXR Portrait photography advice
decent MP (16MP)
provides face detect focus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
good MP (16 megapixels)
includes face detect focusing
delivers RAW formats
manual focus not available
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2")
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Canon A3400 IS Street photography features
Fujifilm F900EXR Street photography features
has image stabilization (Optical)
has touch focus
lighter than competitors (126g)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than others (232 grams)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Canon A3400 IS Sports photography advice
Fujifilm F900EXR Sports photography advice
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
low fps (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (180 per charge)
lacks phase detect auto focus
great zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
comes with phase detect AF
very small sensor (1/2")
not so great battery life (260 per charge)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Canon A3400 IS Travel photography info
Fujifilm F900EXR Travel photography info
lighter than competitors (126g)
has touch focus
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
terrible battery life (180 CIPA)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lighter than others (232 grams)
good MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
quite wide (25mm)
great reach (500mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
not so great battery life (260 per charge)
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Canon A3400 IS
Landscape photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
pretty wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no manual control
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
terrible battery life (180 shots)
does not have Time Lapse function
quite wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
delivers RAW formats
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
very small sensor (1/2")
not so great battery life (260 shots)
does not have Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Canon A3400 IS Vlogging highlights
Fujifilm F900EXR Vlogging highlights
pretty wide (28mm)
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focus
lighter than competitors (126 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have mic port
quite wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others (232 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon A3400 IS vs Fujifilm F900EXR Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A3400 IS | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A3400 IS | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-02-07 | 2013-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | EXR II |
| Sensor type | CCD | EXRCMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/3.5-5.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 11.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 126g (0.28 pounds) | 232g (0.51 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photos | 260 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-11L | NP-50A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $230 | $380 |